From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S267719AbUBTHv3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:51:29 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S267715AbUBTHv3 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:51:29 -0500 Received: from jaguar.mkp.net ([192.139.46.146]:23268 "EHLO jaguar.mkp.net") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S267719AbUBTHv2 (ORCPT ); Fri, 20 Feb 2004 02:51:28 -0500 To: Jeff Garzik Cc: Bill Davidsen , David Mosberger-Tang , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [PATCH] Intel x86-64 support merge References: <1qK5k-7g2-67@gated-at.bofh.it> <1qK5k-7g2-69@gated-at.bofh.it> <1qK5k-7g2-71@gated-at.bofh.it> <1qK5k-7g2-73@gated-at.bofh.it> <1qK5k-7g2-65@gated-at.bofh.it> <40353382.8010505@tmr.com> <40358AC5.90103@pobox.com> From: Jes Sorensen Date: 20 Feb 2004 02:48:06 -0500 In-Reply-To: <40358AC5.90103@pobox.com> Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.2 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Jeff" == Jeff Garzik writes: Jeff> Bill Davidsen wrote: >> Doesn't need it? Does that mean the Win64 uses bounce buffers for >> everything? Or am I totally misreading this? Jeff> Well, for 32-bit PCI hardware on a 64-bit OS, you pretty much Jeff> have to bounce, without an IOMMU. Jeff> I doubt Win64 bounces for 64-bit PCI hardware, but who knows... Just a shame they don't seem to care about performance and allowing one to issue SAC cycles when possible. Oh well, guess one just has to buy a real computer. Cheers, Jes