From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1762176AbcINRYO (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:24:14 -0400 Received: from aserp1040.oracle.com ([141.146.126.69]:18957 "EHLO aserp1040.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1753801AbcINRYL (ORCPT ); Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:24:11 -0400 To: Daniel Wagner Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , Matthew Wilcox , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Daniel Wagner Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] wireless: Use complete() instead complete_all() From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <1473757130-14751-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2016 13:23:46 -0400 In-Reply-To: <1473757130-14751-1-git-send-email-wagi@monom.org> (Daniel Wagner's message of "Tue, 13 Sep 2016 10:58:47 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.5 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Source-IP: aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234] Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org >>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Wagner writes: Daniel> Using complete_all() is not wrong per se but it suggest that Daniel> there might be more than one waiter. For -rt I am reviewing all Daniel> complete_all() users and would like to leave only the real ones Daniel> in the tree. The main problem for -rt about complete_all() is Daniel> that it can be uses inside IRQ context and that can lead to Daniel> unbounded amount work inside the interrupt handler. That is a no Daniel> no for -rt. Daniel> The patches grouped per subsystem and in small batches to allow Daniel> reviewing. Applied to 4.9/scsi-queue. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering