public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
To: Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au>
Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
	linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ncr5380: Exception handling fixes for v4.5
Date: Tue, 01 Mar 2016 08:00:22 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq17fhmcpzt.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <alpine.LNX.2.00.1603011431300.3734@nippy.intranet> (Finn Thain's message of "Tue, 1 Mar 2016 14:32:23 +1100 (AEDT)")

>>>>> "Finn" == Finn Thain <fthain@telegraphics.com.au> writes:

Finn,

>> This is a pretty big lump of changes for a 4.5 bug fix!

Finn> Please keep in mind that these fixes are all rework of the changes
Finn> I made in -rc1. So this submission is 2 files changed, 118
Finn> insertions(+), 148 deletions(-) which is all rework of the
Finn> previous submission, which was 18 files changed, 2940
Finn> insertions(+), 3688 deletions(-)

I am well aware of and appreciate the huge amount of work you have done.

My concern is merely that Linus is going to get pretty upset with such a
big delta this late in the 4.5 cycle. By comparison, our other fixes at
this time are in the 1-5 line bucket!

I think putting the fixes into 4.6 and tagging them for stable is a
better (less emperor penguin wrath-inducing) approach.

-- 
Martin K. Petersen	Oracle Linux Engineering

      reply	other threads:[~2016-03-01 13:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-02-22 23:07 [PATCH 0/6] ncr5380: Exception handling fixes for v4.5 Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 1/6] ncr5380: Correctly clear command pointers and lists after bus reset Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 2/6] ncr5380: Dont release lock for PIO transfer Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 3/6] ncr5380: Dont re-enter NCR5380_select() Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 4/6] ncr5380: Forget aborted commands Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 5/6] ncr5380: Fix NCR5380_select() EH checks and result handling Finn Thain
2016-02-22 23:07 ` [PATCH 6/6] ncr5380: Call scsi_eh_prep_cmnd() and scsi_eh_restore_cmnd() as and when appropriate Finn Thain
2016-03-01  2:31 ` [PATCH 0/6] ncr5380: Exception handling fixes for v4.5 Martin K. Petersen
2016-03-01  3:32   ` Finn Thain
2016-03-01 13:00     ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yq17fhmcpzt.fsf@sermon.lab.mkp.net \
    --to=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=fthain@telegraphics.com.au \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-m68k@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox