From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.9 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_PASS, T_DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40A57ECDFB0 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DF8A3208E3 for ; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="I3pkYc0r" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org DF8A3208E3 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=oracle.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2387813AbeGMDPE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:15:04 -0400 Received: from aserp2120.oracle.com ([141.146.126.78]:58868 "EHLO aserp2120.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2387696AbeGMDPE (ORCPT ); Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:15:04 -0400 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2120.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2120.oracle.com (8.16.0.22/8.16.0.22) with SMTP id w6CNrcng129314; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:28 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=o2kPQAZqxJhpE6DgICCJa219iuNUXiz7IfCVNn0+Dyo=; b=I3pkYc0r9peyM+kbTqfMoC/DfNPmnwEQwXip+uc+MKHQWjHn3P2MbNQTD4rujEp6bmnN KvpTYsEwuP+OlswP4LwGJlk1GEcYmlZ4I9WNa+ZfOujLskfB5qeph+2t5ClIYm0bCVm8 kLEcqH4PlXFPpVNRwtmH03m1M3oEsWAtibhQOG+hC9HxXxD/FjO+CXazDj5aXMg2tmZK LmkFQE//TfyhDZfBONhzg7tAJXmtwoRhcn6CvAYWDMNeEaUSOEcKnccd9Kn5KAWQiWC5 ZfAJz2r1fgCsdf7a10ltLCLwneRHnL5rw2TQCFctrNeOh0JXncqRG07zbo6gN6l/AuII +A== Received: from aserv0022.oracle.com (aserv0022.oracle.com [141.146.126.234]) by aserp2120.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2k2p7e61ts-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:28 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by aserv0022.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6D32RPS013142 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:28 GMT Received: from abhmp0008.oracle.com (abhmp0008.oracle.com [141.146.116.14]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id w6D32QvH031172; Fri, 13 Jul 2018 03:02:26 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Thu, 12 Jul 2018 20:02:26 -0700 To: Arnd Bergmann Cc: Karan Tilak Kumar , Sesidhar Baddela , "James E.J. Bottomley" , "Martin K. Petersen" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] [RESEND] snic: fix printing time intervals From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <20180711123752.773163-1-arnd@arndb.de> Date: Thu, 12 Jul 2018 23:02:23 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20180711123752.773163-1-arnd@arndb.de> (Arnd Bergmann's message of "Wed, 11 Jul 2018 14:37:37 +0200") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.3 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=8952 signatures=668706 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 suspectscore=0 malwarescore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 mlxscore=0 mlxlogscore=402 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1806210000 definitions=main-1807120253 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Arnd, > We don't want to use 'struct timespec' because of the y2038 overflow > problem. The overflow is not actually an issue here, but it's easy to > replace with 'timespec64' for consistency. However, it's worth pointing > out that nanosecond values have nine digits, not eight or ten, so I'm > fixing the format strings accordingly as well. Applied to 4.19/scsi-queue, thanks! -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering