* [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk()
@ 2025-08-25 18:39 Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning " Abinash Singh
` (3 more replies)
0 siblings, 4 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-08-25 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, abinashsinghlalotra, dlemoal, linux-kernel,
linux-scsi, martin.petersen
Hi all,
This v10 series addresses a build warning and does minor cleanups in
sd_revalidate_disk().
Changes since v9:
- Moved the build warning fix to patch 1/3 so that it can be
easily backported.
- Added "Fixes:" and "Cc: stable" tags to patch 1/3 as suggested
by Damien.
- Moved the redundant printk removal to patch 2/3, since it is
not a backport candidate and also removed "fixes:" tag from it as
it is not a bug.
- Incorporated Reviewed-by tags from Damien.
- Updated changelogs accordingly.
Summary of changes:
1. Fix excessive stack usage warning in sd_revalidate_disk() by
replacing a large local struct with a kmalloc() allocation.
2. Remove a redundant "out of memory" printk after kmalloc()
failure. The page allocator already reports allocation failures.
3. Make sd_revalidate_disk() return void, since its return value
is unused by all callers.
Thanks for the reviews and guidance.
Abinash
Abinash Singh (3):
scsi: sd: Fix build warning in sd_revalidate_disk()
scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure
scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 58 ++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------------------
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 28 deletions(-)
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning in sd_revalidate_disk()
2025-08-25 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-25 18:39 ` Abinash Singh
2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure Abinash Singh
` (2 subsequent siblings)
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-08-25 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, abinashsinghlalotra, dlemoal, linux-kernel,
linux-scsi, martin.petersen, stable
A build warning was triggered due to excessive stack usage in
sd_revalidate_disk():
drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function ‘sd_revalidate_disk.isra’:
drivers/scsi/sd.c:3824:1: warning: the frame size of 1160 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
This is caused by a large local struct queue_limits (~400B) allocated
on the stack. Replacing it with a heap allocation using kmalloc()
significantly reduces frame usage. Kernel stack is limited (~8 KB),
and allocating large structs on the stack is discouraged.
As the function already performs heap allocations (e.g. for buffer),
this change fits well.
Fixes: 804e498e0496 ("sd: convert to the atomic queue limits API")
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++---------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 5b8668accf8e..bf12e23f1212 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -3696,10 +3696,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
sector_t old_capacity = sdkp->capacity;
- struct queue_limits lim;
- unsigned char *buffer;
+ struct queue_limits *lim = NULL;
+ unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
unsigned int dev_max;
- int err;
+ int err = 0;
SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(3, sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp,
"sd_revalidate_disk\n"));
@@ -3711,6 +3711,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
if (!scsi_device_online(sdp))
goto out;
+ lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
+ if (!lim)
+ goto out;
+
buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buffer) {
sd_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp, "sd_revalidate_disk: Memory "
@@ -3720,14 +3724,14 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
sd_spinup_disk(sdkp);
- lim = queue_limits_start_update(sdkp->disk->queue);
+ *lim = queue_limits_start_update(sdkp->disk->queue);
/*
* Without media there is no reason to ask; moreover, some devices
* react badly if we do.
*/
if (sdkp->media_present) {
- sd_read_capacity(sdkp, &lim, buffer);
+ sd_read_capacity(sdkp, lim, buffer);
/*
* Some USB/UAS devices return generic values for mode pages
* until the media has been accessed. Trigger a READ operation
@@ -3741,17 +3745,17 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
* cause this to be updated correctly and any device which
* doesn't support it should be treated as rotational.
*/
- lim.features |= (BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL | BLK_FEAT_ADD_RANDOM);
+ lim->features |= (BLK_FEAT_ROTATIONAL | BLK_FEAT_ADD_RANDOM);
if (scsi_device_supports_vpd(sdp)) {
sd_read_block_provisioning(sdkp);
- sd_read_block_limits(sdkp, &lim);
+ sd_read_block_limits(sdkp, lim);
sd_read_block_limits_ext(sdkp);
- sd_read_block_characteristics(sdkp, &lim);
- sd_zbc_read_zones(sdkp, &lim, buffer);
+ sd_read_block_characteristics(sdkp, lim);
+ sd_zbc_read_zones(sdkp, lim, buffer);
}
- sd_config_discard(sdkp, &lim, sd_discard_mode(sdkp));
+ sd_config_discard(sdkp, lim, sd_discard_mode(sdkp));
sd_print_capacity(sdkp, old_capacity);
@@ -3761,47 +3765,46 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
sd_read_app_tag_own(sdkp, buffer);
sd_read_write_same(sdkp, buffer);
sd_read_security(sdkp, buffer);
- sd_config_protection(sdkp, &lim);
+ sd_config_protection(sdkp, lim);
}
/*
* We now have all cache related info, determine how we deal
* with flush requests.
*/
- sd_set_flush_flag(sdkp, &lim);
+ sd_set_flush_flag(sdkp, lim);
/* Initial block count limit based on CDB TRANSFER LENGTH field size. */
dev_max = sdp->use_16_for_rw ? SD_MAX_XFER_BLOCKS : SD_DEF_XFER_BLOCKS;
/* Some devices report a maximum block count for READ/WRITE requests. */
dev_max = min_not_zero(dev_max, sdkp->max_xfer_blocks);
- lim.max_dev_sectors = logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max);
+ lim->max_dev_sectors = logical_to_sectors(sdp, dev_max);
if (sd_validate_min_xfer_size(sdkp))
- lim.io_min = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->min_xfer_blocks);
+ lim->io_min = logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->min_xfer_blocks);
else
- lim.io_min = 0;
+ lim->io_min = 0;
/*
* Limit default to SCSI host optimal sector limit if set. There may be
* an impact on performance for when the size of a request exceeds this
* host limit.
*/
- lim.io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
+ lim->io_opt = sdp->host->opt_sectors << SECTOR_SHIFT;
if (sd_validate_opt_xfer_size(sdkp, dev_max)) {
- lim.io_opt = min_not_zero(lim.io_opt,
+ lim->io_opt = min_not_zero(lim->io_opt,
logical_to_bytes(sdp, sdkp->opt_xfer_blocks));
}
sdkp->first_scan = 0;
set_capacity_and_notify(disk, logical_to_sectors(sdp, sdkp->capacity));
- sd_config_write_same(sdkp, &lim);
- kfree(buffer);
+ sd_config_write_same(sdkp, lim);
- err = queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(sdkp->disk->queue, &lim);
+ err = queue_limits_commit_update_frozen(sdkp->disk->queue, lim);
if (err)
- return err;
+ goto out;
/*
* Query concurrent positioning ranges after
@@ -3820,7 +3823,10 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
set_capacity_and_notify(disk, 0);
out:
- return 0;
+ kfree(buffer);
+ kfree(lim);
+
+ return err;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure
2025-08-25 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning " Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-25 18:39 ` Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 19:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void Abinash Singh
2025-08-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-08-25 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, abinashsinghlalotra, dlemoal, linux-kernel,
linux-scsi, martin.petersen
The SCSI disk driver prints a warning when kmalloc() fails in
sd_revalidate_disk(). This is redundant because the page allocator
already reports failures unless __GFP_NOWARN is used. Keeping the
extra message only adds noise to the kernel log.
Remove the unnecessary sd_printk() call. Control flow is unchanged.
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 5 +----
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index bf12e23f1212..35856685d7fa 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -3716,11 +3716,8 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
goto out;
buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
- if (!buffer) {
- sd_printk(KERN_WARNING, sdkp, "sd_revalidate_disk: Memory "
- "allocation failure.\n");
+ if (!buffer)
goto out;
- }
sd_spinup_disk(sdkp);
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
2025-08-25 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning " Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-25 18:39 ` Abinash Singh
2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 1 reply; 8+ messages in thread
From: Abinash Singh @ 2025-08-25 18:39 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, abinashsinghlalotra, dlemoal, linux-kernel,
linux-scsi, martin.petersen
The sd_revalidate_disk() function currently returns 0 for
both success and memory allocation failure.Since none of its
callers use the return value, this return code is both unnecessary
and potentially misleading.
Change the return type of sd_revalidate_disk() from int to void
and remove all return value handling. This makes the function
semantics clearer and avoids confusion about unused return codes.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
---
drivers/scsi/sd.c | 11 +++++------
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/sd.c b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
index 35856685d7fa..b3926c43e700 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/sd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/sd.c
@@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ static void sd_config_discard(struct scsi_disk *sdkp, struct queue_limits *lim,
unsigned int mode);
static void sd_config_write_same(struct scsi_disk *sdkp,
struct queue_limits *lim);
-static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
+static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *);
static void sd_unlock_native_capacity(struct gendisk *disk);
static void sd_shutdown(struct device *);
static void scsi_disk_release(struct device *cdev);
@@ -3691,7 +3691,7 @@ static void sd_read_block_zero(struct scsi_disk *sdkp)
* performs disk spin up, read_capacity, etc.
* @disk: struct gendisk we care about
**/
-static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
+static void sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
{
struct scsi_disk *sdkp = scsi_disk(disk);
struct scsi_device *sdp = sdkp->device;
@@ -3699,7 +3699,7 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
struct queue_limits *lim = NULL;
unsigned char *buffer = NULL;
unsigned int dev_max;
- int err = 0;
+ int err;
SCSI_LOG_HLQUEUE(3, sd_printk(KERN_INFO, sdkp,
"sd_revalidate_disk\n"));
@@ -3709,11 +3709,11 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
* of the other niceties.
*/
if (!scsi_device_online(sdp))
- goto out;
+ return;
lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!lim)
- goto out;
+ return;
buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
if (!buffer)
@@ -3823,7 +3823,6 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
kfree(buffer);
kfree(lim);
- return err;
}
/**
--
2.43.0
^ permalink raw reply related [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-25 19:26 ` Bart Van Assche
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Bart Van Assche @ 2025-08-25 19:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh
Cc: James.Bottomley, dlemoal, linux-kernel, linux-scsi,
martin.petersen
On 8/25/25 11:39 AM, Abinash Singh wrote:
> Remove the unnecessary sd_printk() call. Control flow is unchanged.
Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-26 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh, bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, martin.petersen
On 8/26/25 03:39, Abinash Singh wrote:
> The sd_revalidate_disk() function currently returns 0 for
> both success and memory allocation failure.Since none of its
> callers use the return value, this return code is both unnecessary
> and potentially misleading.
>
> Change the return type of sd_revalidate_disk() from int to void
> and remove all return value handling. This makes the function
> semantics clearer and avoids confusion about unused return codes.
>
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
[...]
> lim = kmalloc(sizeof(*lim), GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!lim)
> - goto out;
> + return;
>
> buffer = kmalloc(SD_BUF_SIZE, GFP_KERNEL);
> if (!buffer)
> @@ -3823,7 +3823,6 @@ static int sd_revalidate_disk(struct gendisk *disk)
> kfree(buffer);
> kfree(lim);
>
Nit: please delete the blank line above too.
> - return err;
> }
>
> /**
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning in sd_revalidate_disk()
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning " Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
0 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Damien Le Moal @ 2025-08-26 5:10 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh, bvanassche
Cc: James.Bottomley, linux-kernel, linux-scsi, martin.petersen,
stable
On 8/26/25 03:39, Abinash Singh wrote:
> A build warning was triggered due to excessive stack usage in
> sd_revalidate_disk():
>
> drivers/scsi/sd.c: In function ‘sd_revalidate_disk.isra’:
> drivers/scsi/sd.c:3824:1: warning: the frame size of 1160 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes [-Wframe-larger-than=]
>
> This is caused by a large local struct queue_limits (~400B) allocated
> on the stack. Replacing it with a heap allocation using kmalloc()
> significantly reduces frame usage. Kernel stack is limited (~8 KB),
> and allocating large structs on the stack is discouraged.
> As the function already performs heap allocations (e.g. for buffer),
> this change fits well.
>
> Fixes: 804e498e0496 ("sd: convert to the atomic queue limits API")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Reviewed-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> Signed-off-by: Abinash Singh <abinashsinghlalotra@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
* Re: [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk()
2025-08-25 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void Abinash Singh
@ 2025-08-31 1:19 ` Martin K. Petersen
3 siblings, 0 replies; 8+ messages in thread
From: Martin K. Petersen @ 2025-08-31 1:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Abinash Singh
Cc: bvanassche, James.Bottomley, dlemoal, linux-kernel, linux-scsi,
martin.petersen
Abinash,
> This v10 series addresses a build warning and does minor cleanups in
> sd_revalidate_disk().
Applied to 6.18/scsi-staging, thanks!
--
Martin K. Petersen
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 8+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-08-31 1:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-08-25 18:39 [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 1/3] scsi: sd: Fix build warning " Abinash Singh
2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 2/3] scsi: sd: Remove redundant printk after kmalloc failure Abinash Singh
2025-08-25 19:26 ` Bart Van Assche
2025-08-25 18:39 ` [PATCH v10 3/3] scsi: sd: make sd_revalidate_disk() return void Abinash Singh
2025-08-26 5:10 ` Damien Le Moal
2025-08-31 1:19 ` [PATCH v10 0/3] scsi: sd: Cleanups and warning fixes in sd_revalidate_disk() Martin K. Petersen
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).