From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.2 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_PASS,UNPARSEABLE_RELAY autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE699C43381 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE39B21738 for ; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=oracle.com header.i=@oracle.com header.b="C1qAtII0" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730265AbfBTAak (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:30:40 -0500 Received: from aserp2130.oracle.com ([141.146.126.79]:33508 "EHLO aserp2130.oracle.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730229AbfBTAaj (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:30:39 -0500 Received: from pps.filterd (aserp2130.oracle.com [127.0.0.1]) by aserp2130.oracle.com (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x1K0OETo099996; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:36 GMT DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=oracle.com; h=to : cc : subject : from : references : date : in-reply-to : message-id : mime-version : content-type; s=corp-2018-07-02; bh=6qp06mEP2j4d1IHMOjTQwoeB7xkMftoXiYjoQNED7As=; b=C1qAtII0Ni4yV/YRTgxe93KX+MCd9Yrl6HW2Ev/cmjk/kj5bhvlHxjnlV9rFN3EYHuCi mT4kq1jCvHaOsoNnXwYKTucDxXqp9G+Ho5pRX2pMqOKJWfneFI3OWiT+hr8vcc+spq3e xbFLP6e4Wb87mbgQ0Mz1RO8yefP7A+nBQoeUMKy8XZFevl/1XPsHRNDrbSW+V67m1rxE +KSjkt0nTQ+YxAaMIXms89VnXMN3+Qq3R5LOkGlC5tkY+6/WIU9haDIGg4SD+j/JW2Rk uoGarU3+xASqhhmGyaigp3+48hcQw2p9tGQimOmbvkRH/jUEkh82C9zGzN/jZ1gq0cK/ uw== Received: from userv0021.oracle.com (userv0021.oracle.com [156.151.31.71]) by aserp2130.oracle.com with ESMTP id 2qp81e6ruy-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:36 +0000 Received: from userv0122.oracle.com (userv0122.oracle.com [156.151.31.75]) by userv0021.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1K0UZle010516 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=OK); Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:35 GMT Received: from abhmp0001.oracle.com (abhmp0001.oracle.com [141.146.116.7]) by userv0122.oracle.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id x1K0UYh3022456; Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:30:34 GMT Received: from ca-mkp.ca.oracle.com (/10.159.214.123) by default (Oracle Beehive Gateway v4.0) with ESMTP ; Tue, 19 Feb 2019 16:30:34 -0800 To: Avri Altman Cc: "Martin K. Petersen" , "James E.J. Bottomley" , SCSI , LKML , Avi Shchislowski , Alex Lemberg , Evan Green Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 3/3] scsi: ufs-bsg: Allow reading descriptors From: "Martin K. Petersen" Organization: Oracle Corporation References: <1548572868-12589-1-git-send-email-avri.altman@wdc.com> <1548572868-12589-4-git-send-email-avri.altman@wdc.com> Date: Tue, 19 Feb 2019 19:30:31 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Avri Altman's message of "Tue, 19 Feb 2019 11:44:27 +0000") Message-ID: User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.1 (gnu/linux) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=nai engine=5900 definitions=9172 signatures=668683 X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=notspam policy=default score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=646 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1902200001 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi Avri, > A kind reminder. It's expired from patchwork so now is an excellent time to repost. Generally speaking, resubmitting patches is superior to pinging. While I personally dig through the archives to revisit older patches, I can almost guarantee that no other potential reviewers will do the same. The best way to get a patch back on people's radar is to repost it. -- Martin K. Petersen Oracle Linux Engineering