From: "Martin K. Petersen" <mkp@mkp.net>
To: Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>, kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: Compactflash cards dying?
Date: 02 Feb 2003 21:04:23 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq1smv6qfvc.fsf@austin.mkp.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1044232591.545.8.camel@sonja>
>>>>> "Daniel" == Daniel Egger <degger@fhm.edu> writes:
Daniel> CF has limited write cycles. A few hundred if you're lucky.
Aah, that's a bit pessimistic. Even for a regular flash.
It is true that the number of write cycles varies between cards. Some
vendors have both consumer and industrial grade cards, and the
industrial grade ones use better parts inside.
However, I have yet to see a CF card which didn't survive beyond a
million writes.
Note that CF cards do transparent wear averaging inside. So it's
obviously not a million writes to the same physical spot. Also, most
vendors claim they have spare blocks for relocating areas that are
completely worn out.
So while a Compact Flash isn't a hard disk, it is at least a couple of
orders of magnitude better than "hundreds of writes".
--
Martin K. Petersen Wild Open Source, Inc.
mkp@wildopensource.com http://www.wildopensource.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2003-02-03 1:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2003-02-02 22:30 Compactflash cards dying? Pavel Machek
2003-02-02 23:57 ` Willy Tarreau
2003-02-03 12:53 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-03 0:36 ` Daniel Egger
2003-02-03 2:04 ` Martin K. Petersen [this message]
2003-02-03 8:39 ` Jörn Engel
2003-02-03 13:58 ` Martin K. Petersen
2003-02-03 8:50 ` Miquel van Smoorenburg
2003-02-03 7:12 ` Bryan Andersen
2003-02-03 14:08 ` Martin K. Petersen
2003-02-03 14:10 ` Padraig
2003-02-03 14:30 ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 14:25 ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 21:18 ` Bryan Andersen
2003-02-04 20:59 ` Bill Davidsen
2003-02-04 21:07 ` John Bradford
2003-02-03 7:30 ` Andreas Jellinghaus
2003-02-03 12:54 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-03 23:12 ` David Woodhouse
2003-02-04 3:39 ` H. Peter Anvin
2003-02-04 11:24 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-04 11:30 ` David Woodhouse
2003-02-04 19:28 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-03 23:56 ` Roger Larsson
2003-02-04 0:10 ` David Woodhouse
2003-02-04 23:28 ` Pavel Machek
2003-02-04 0:34 ` Andrew McGregor
2003-02-04 23:27 ` Pavel Machek
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq1smv6qfvc.fsf@austin.mkp.net \
--to=mkp@mkp.net \
--cc=degger@fhm.edu \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox