From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca>
Cc: Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
robin.murphy@arm.com, m.szyprowski@samsung.com, will@kernel.org,
maz@kernel.org, suzuki.poulose@arm.com, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
jiri@resnulli.us
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] dma-mapping: Decrypt memory on remap
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2026 18:43:49 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5abjflptv6.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260414122208.GV3694781@ziepe.ca>
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@ziepe.ca> writes:
> On Tue, Apr 14, 2026 at 03:01:15PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Mostafa Saleh <smostafa@google.com> writes:
>>
>> > In case memory needs to be remapped on systems with
>> > force_dma_unencrypted(), where this memory is not allocated
>> > from a restricted-dma pool, this was currently ignored, while only
>> > setting the decrypted pgprot in the remapped alias.
>> >
>> > The memory still needs to be decrypted in that case.
>> >
>>
>> For ARM CCA, we cannot mark a vmap address as decrypted.
>
> Why not? pgprot_decrypted is passed to vmap, why can't it work?
>
I might have confused you in my previous reply. What I meant is that, if
we do not have a linear map, we currently cannot change the page
attributes. We are avoiding that by requesting a non-HighMem address.
What I am suggesting here is that we should document this, or perhaps
handle it as a separate patch as done in [1] by explicitly stating the
challenges
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260102155037.2551524-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org
> Jason
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-14 13:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-08 19:47 [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] dma-mapping: Fixes for memory encryption Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-08 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 1/5] swiotlb: Return state of memory from swiotlb_alloc() Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-14 9:25 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-08 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 2/5] dma-mapping: Move encryption in __dma_direct_free_pages() Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-10 17:45 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-08 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 3/5] dma-mapping: Decrypt memory on remap Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-14 9:31 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-14 12:22 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-14 13:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-04-14 13:53 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-08 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 4/5] dma-mapping: Encapsulate memory state during allocation Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-10 18:05 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-08 19:47 ` [RFC PATCH v3 5/5] dma-mapping: Fix memory decryption issues Mostafa Saleh
2026-04-13 7:19 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-13 12:42 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2026-04-14 9:37 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-04-10 17:43 ` [RFC PATCH v3 0/5] dma-mapping: Fixes for memory encryption Jason Gunthorpe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5abjflptv6.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=jgg@ziepe.ca \
--cc=jiri@resnulli.us \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=maz@kernel.org \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=smostafa@google.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox