From: Aneesh Kumar K.V <aneesh.kumar@kernel.org>
To: Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com>,
iommu@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@kernel.org>,
Linus Walleij <linusw@kernel.org>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@arm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dma-direct: Skip cache prep for HighMem coherent allocations
Date: Mon, 12 Jan 2026 17:52:08 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yq5afr8bdnrj.fsf@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <f827085f-0084-41d8-8ab5-a0ecfc0260d2@samsung.com>
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@samsung.com> writes:
> On 09.01.2026 04:15, Aneesh Kumar K.V wrote:
>> Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@arm.com> writes:
>>> On 2026-01-08 12:41 pm, Marek Szyprowski wrote:
>>>> On 08.01.2026 11:50, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>>> On 2026-01-02 3:51 pm, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote:
>>>>>> dma_direct_alloc() calls arch_dma_prep_coherent() to clean any dirty
>>>>>> cache lines from the kernel linear alias before creating a coherent
>>>>>> remapping.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> HighMem pages have no kernel alias mapping, so there are no alias cache
>>>>>> lines to clean. Skip arch_dma_prep_coherent() for HighMem allocations.
>>>>> This is assuming that caches are always cleaned when unmapping
>>>>> highmem, and no still-mapped highmem pages are dirty - how is that
>>>>> guaranteed? The fact that they're not in the linear map doesn't mean
>>>>> they don't necessarily have kernel aliases in either vmalloc
>>>>> pagetables or caches.
>>>> Right, so it is better to keep this unconditional
>>>> arch_dma_prep_coherent() call. I will drop it from dma-mapping-fixes then.
>>> Yeah, I think the confusing thing here is that there are architectures
>>> with CONFIG_HIGHMEM that don't actually check for and handle it in their
>>> arch_dma_prep_coherent() as they seemingly should, however I'm not sure
>>> off-hand whether they also support/use highmem CMA in the manner that
>>> could end up being an issue in practice (the lack of any reports of
>>> crashes or DMA corruption over the last however many years suggests not...)
>>>
>> Should we then remove the PageHighMem() check with DMA_ATTR_NO_KERNEL_MAPPING?
>
> Right, this has to be unified.
I had a related question, how do we handle cache flushes required for
architectures that don't implement CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_DMA_PREP_COHERENT (arch/arm)?
-aneesh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-12 12:22 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <CGME20260102155138eucas1p1563e460256561f6974079d3de733e895@eucas1p1.samsung.com>
2026-01-02 15:51 ` [PATCH] dma-direct: Skip cache prep for HighMem coherent allocations Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm)
2026-01-08 8:38 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-08 9:55 ` Arnd Bergmann
2026-01-08 10:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-08 10:50 ` Robin Murphy
2026-01-08 12:41 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-08 12:59 ` Robin Murphy
2026-01-09 3:15 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-01-12 9:08 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-12 12:22 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V [this message]
2026-01-16 10:29 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-19 4:13 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
2026-01-19 9:18 ` Marek Szyprowski
2026-01-20 9:49 ` Aneesh Kumar K.V
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yq5afr8bdnrj.fsf@kernel.org \
--to=aneesh.kumar@kernel.org \
--cc=arnd@kernel.org \
--cc=iommu@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linusw@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=m.szyprowski@samsung.com \
--cc=robin.murphy@arm.com \
--cc=suzuki.poulose@arm.com \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox