From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-alma10-1.taild15c8.ts.net [100.103.45.18]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9C69F433BAF; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:22:25 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785932546; cv=none; b=Z36038C2o4rgeT4cWdqNv3/ReGM9PxPV1TU82gNjF4+hzgvKTZ7VQ8wKuRHsbZWT5WHaCUno4Qp/AmuzNCRslcq5lsemBwSWtbvjD8LOuvm1A2BBYBFkubvj6+1hOoZaelrtxvTWnTD/B7oR1W2w21vyZoIv9DF4n0+QHgBsMmk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1785932546; c=relaxed/simple; bh=OHqTPpoy4PlrSjK5plmGj+ERzLd4Tg5Z8i+fDM3t4Tg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=mfZnLXz86mC3sR/rqLLq3jJavRGCYEi+Q1cYNkgm2jy7OYquKMdF0MAZydAvstqmvmTBq/WkXnWJEF3mdL90qyT6Hrpv2HYtg5QiR/VpVV9jgJdV20VRNR7+0CXGPsi3uh7AxWzWCOH1kUrZ3BIqVuslijWs1YcmBKwdSNUrC9o= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=d6OiclPv; arc=none smtp.client-ip=100.103.45.18 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="d6OiclPv" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4B0D81F000E9; Wed, 5 Aug 2026 12:22:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kernel.org; s=k20260515; t=1785932545; bh=OHqTPpoy4PlrSjK5plmGj+ERzLd4Tg5Z8i+fDM3t4Tg=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:Date; b=d6OiclPvJS/21qaE6HRFu5Cd9pppTVz8Z7gq3bGnzkapMrP4+qwNgwAEUDUZF3CsB elSFTEmNXwLrS/m5A9zKH2TtagQ6Jj5nGFSSyMLAKYDos1qwOEcFfMwRn8og1htpMO 88cbECxUyTntBhcbLFpUwjrzFlLJY3x/3EyHDEq25vdvr/nFilqdN6PcqeznXFjNF3 gd28hdU0y+C3+sdx4bo2GYv2Ybcp2wrDXdq9btP50HNeyK7yy/KQBhOxfeN8Kzug2I 5VVU53QIBho1A2kTD1D3R0g0tz82ZILCqC1O9SaguLJUWkoVzwdkBKTtyiO/DjDoKo uw6fQESbB5xXA== X-Mailer: emacs 30.2 (via feedmail 11-beta-1 I) From: Aneesh Kumar K.V To: Catalin Marinas Cc: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Greg KH , Jeremy Linton , Jonathan Cameron , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Mark Rutland , Sudeep Holla , Will Deacon , Steven Price , Suzuki K Poulose , Andre Przywara Subject: Re: [PATCH v9 0/7] Switch Arm SMCCC firmware services to an SMCCC bus In-Reply-To: References: <20260805063255.1638614-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org> Date: Wed, 05 Aug 2026 17:52:17 +0530 Message-ID: Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Catalin Marinas writes: > On Wed, Aug 05, 2026 at 12:02:48PM +0530, Aneesh Kumar K.V (Arm) wrote: >> Changes from v8: >> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260707081351.1680209-1-aneesh.kumar@kernel.org >> * Rebase onto the arm64 for-next/core branch. > > Was there a dependency on anything in for-next/core? We normally apply > series on their own branch on top of the vanilla kernel (e.g. 7.2-rc3) > and merge everything together in for-next/core. We (and many other > maintainers) strongly prefer series posted on top of an -rc kernel > (typically -rc1 to -rc3) unless there's a dependency on a different > branch. Never based on -next or -next like branches (which is what > for-next/core is, as the name implies). > The reason is that these two patches create conflicts. Since this series involves file movement, resolving those conflicts was not straightforward. Therefore, I rebased the series on top of both of the following commits: commit 24f55f511b9e ("virt: arm-cca-guest: use migrate_disable() for attestation token requests") commit e62decaf98e7 ("arm64/coco: Add pKVM as a CC platform") -aneesh