From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1757199Ab1GMSE2 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:04:28 -0400 Received: from home.keithp.com ([63.227.221.253]:40810 "EHLO keithp.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757058Ab1GMSE1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Jul 2011 14:04:27 -0400 From: Keith Packard To: Wolfram Sang Cc: Dave Airlie , linux-kernel , dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, Intel drivers Subject: Re: [PULL] drm-intel-next In-Reply-To: <20110713172214.GA16594@pengutronix.de> References: <20110713172214.GA16594@pengutronix.de> User-Agent: Notmuch/0.5-202-g6ae4e7d (http://notmuchmail.org) Emacs/23.3.1 (i486-pc-linux-gnu) Date: Wed, 13 Jul 2011 11:04:23 -0700 Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --=-=-= Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, 13 Jul 2011 19:22:14 +0200, Wolfram Sang wr= ote: > Is this one intentionally not in or did it slip through? I thought I had replied to that -- it doesn't apply to either -fixes or =2Dnext at this point. I can try to fix it, but I'd prefer it if you'd figure out how things have changed and re-test a modified version. Sorry for not pinging you when I didn't hear back. =2D-=20 keith.packard@intel.com --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) iD8DBQFOHd4nQp8BWwlsTdMRApOOAKDRS1BGV4qbwIQhOjfQXyiJc8M4+QCgoi6z R/mmhdB0ky5mY0mB1hNdwxs= =TwP9 -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--