From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Why are 2.6 modules so huge?
Date: Tue, 24 Feb 2004 16:46:19 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1x1xokcwfo.fsf@kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9cfptc4lckg.fsf@rogue.ncsl.nist.gov
Ian Soboroff <ian.soboroff@nist.gov> writes:
> Can anyone help me understand why 2.6-series kernel modules are so
> huge?
>
> 2.6.3/kernel/fs/vfat:
> total 288
> -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 289086 Feb 24 10:09 vfat.ko
My 2.6.3 vfat.ko is 15365 bytes. Maybe you enabled kernel debugging
symbols.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-24 15:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-24 15:30 Why are 2.6 modules so huge? Ian Soboroff
2004-02-24 15:40 ` Norberto Bensa
2004-02-24 15:46 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2004-02-25 7:28 ` Harald Dunkel
2004-02-25 8:56 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-24 15:50 ` Brian Gerst
2004-02-24 16:03 ` Ian Soboroff
2004-02-24 15:50 ` Jan De Luyck
2004-02-24 16:05 ` James Morris
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1x1xokcwfo.fsf@kth.se \
--to=mru@kth.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox