From: "Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>
To: Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>, <linux-spi@vger.kernel.org>,
<linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
Cyrille Pitchen <cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com>, "Yang\,
Wenyou" <Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2016 02:07:37 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1x37u2ut92.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5694BE36.7060702@atmel.com> (Nicolas Ferre's message of "Tue, 12 Jan 2016 09:49:58 +0100")
Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> writes:
> Le 11/01/2016 16:43, Måns Rullgård a écrit :
>> Nicolas Ferre <nicolas.ferre@atmel.com> writes:
>>
>>> Le 08/01/2016 01:11, Mans Rullgard a écrit :
>>>> The driver currently chooses between internal chip-select or gpio
>>>> based on the existence of the cs-gpios DT property which fails on
>>>> non-DT systems and also enforces the same choice for all devices.
>>>
>>> Well, I fear that such a per-device choice may impact further the driver
>>> than just moving a field from one structure to another...
>>
>> Could you please elaborate?
>
> Well, the first thing that comes to my mind is that the DT property may
> need to be to the SPI device node and not the controller anymore, for a
> need of coherency.
> That would imply modifying the binding and I don't want that for such an
> useless "improvement".
>
>>> Moreover, I have the feeling that it was not the objective of this
>>> patch.
>>
>> Your feeling is mistaken. If it's somehow impossible to mix CS types,
>> please explain why.
>
> Please only fix the avr32 issue with CS gpio selection that I admit we
> have. I don't need nor want to mix CS types: it just doesn't make sense
> to allow it.
There's also this comment in spi.h regarding struct spi_master:
* @cs_gpios: Array of GPIOs to use as chip select lines; one per CS
* number. Any individual value may be -ENOENT for CS lines that
* are not GPIOs (driven by the SPI controller itself).
--
Måns Rullgård
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-01-13 2:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-01-08 0:11 [PATCH] spi: atmel: improve internal vs gpio chip-select choice Mans Rullgard
2016-01-11 15:26 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-01-11 15:43 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-12 8:49 ` Nicolas Ferre
2016-01-12 9:08 ` Måns Rullgård
2016-01-13 2:07 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2016-01-11 16:33 ` Cyrille Pitchen
2016-01-11 16:37 ` Måns Rullgård
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1x37u2ut92.fsf@unicorn.mansr.com \
--to=mans@mansr.com \
--cc=Wenyou.Yang@atmel.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cyrille.pitchen@atmel.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nicolas.ferre@atmel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox