From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264262AbTLBA6R (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:58:17 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264264AbTLBA6R (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:58:17 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:42728 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264262AbTLBA6P (ORCPT ); Mon, 1 Dec 2003 19:58:15 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: 2.6 security patches merged? was: Linux 2.4 future Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 01:58:12 +0100 Message-ID: References: <200312011226.04750.nbensa@gmx.net> <20031201233025.GK1566@mis-mike-wstn.matchmail.com> <20031201160649.A9693@osdlab.pdx.osdl.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:OHl2bbVnSy5mbCBzI3+mc7AefEg= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Chris Wright writes: >> That reminds me, have all of the security patches that went into 2.4 been >> forward ported to 2.6 and merged already? > > Forward ported: yes. Merged: still underway. And the merging won't be complete before 2.6 hits the streets, or what? -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se