From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S264428AbTLQPUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:20:11 -0500 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S264429AbTLQPUL (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:20:11 -0500 Received: from main.gmane.org ([80.91.224.249]:49900 "EHLO main.gmane.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S264428AbTLQPUJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 17 Dec 2003 10:20:09 -0500 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: mru@kth.se (=?iso-8859-1?q?M=E5ns_Rullg=E5rd?=) Subject: Re: no atapi cdrecord burning with 2.6.0-test11-bk10 / bk13 Date: Wed, 17 Dec 2003 16:20:05 +0100 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org User-Agent: Gnus/5.1002 (Gnus v5.10.2) XEmacs/21.4 (Rational FORTRAN, linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:Y4uL5/wYs995c3hgsNudQ49wZZU= Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Thomas Voegtle writes: > cdrecord -dev=ATAPI -scanbus with 2.6.0-test11-bk10 and bk13 shows this: cdrecord dev=/dev/cdrom -scanbus is the recommended way, whatever cdrecord tries to make you believe. -- Måns Rullgård mru@kth.se