Re: [PATCH v3] irqchip/tango: Don't use incorrect irq_mask_ack callback

["Måns Rullgård" <mans@mansr.com>]

Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com> writes:

> irq_gc_mask_disable_reg_and_ack() is not equivalent to
> irq_gc_mask_disable_reg() and irq_gc_ack_set_bit().
>
> Leave the irq_mask_ack callback undefined, and let the irqchip
> framework use irq_mask and irq_ack instead.
>
> Reported-by: Doug Berger <opendmb@gmail.com>
> Fixes: 4bba66899ac6 ("irqchip/tango: Add support for Sigma Designs SMP86xx/SMP87xx interrupt controller")
> Signed-off-by: Marc Gonzalez <marc_gonzalez@sigmadesigns.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> As discussed previously, it is acceptable for tango to rely
> on mask_ack_irq() doing the right thing(TM).
> ---
>  drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c | 1 -
>  1 file changed, 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c
> index bdbb5c0ff7fe..825085cdab99 100644
> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c
> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-tango.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,6 @@ static void __init tangox_irq_init_chip(struct irq_chip_generic *gc,
>  	for (i = 0; i < 2; i++) {
>  		ct[i].chip.irq_ack = irq_gc_ack_set_bit;
>  		ct[i].chip.irq_mask = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg;
> -		ct[i].chip.irq_mask_ack = irq_gc_mask_disable_reg_and_ack;
>  		ct[i].chip.irq_unmask = irq_gc_unmask_enable_reg;
>  		ct[i].chip.irq_set_type = tangox_irq_set_type;
>  		ct[i].chip.name = gc->domain->name;
> -- 

What happened to the patch adding the proper combined function?

-- 
Måns Rullgård