From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel
Date: Fri, 06 Feb 2004 19:54:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xoescqbr4.fsf@kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 200402061822.i16IMdHJ013686@turing-police.cc.vt.edu
Valdis.Kletnieks@vt.edu writes:
> On Fri, 06 Feb 2004 13:00:38 EST, "Richard B. Johnson" said:
>
>> Yes you can. You just don't use an ';' if you are going
>> to use 'else'.
>
> You did realize we've changed things from macros to inline functions
> (and vice versa) on occasion?
>
> Yes, you *can* hack around the "problem". Is there any actual
> evidence that any real performance issues arise from the null
> do/while? Does said issue outweigh the increased fragility of
> the code?
I suspect that the compiler authors are well aware of this common
idiom and take care to do whatever is appropriate.
--
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-02-06 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-02-06 16:42 [Infiniband-general] Getting an Infiniband access layer in theLinux kernel Hefty, Sean
2004-02-06 17:05 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 17:23 ` Roland Dreier
2004-02-06 18:00 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 18:12 ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-06 18:13 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-06 18:22 ` Valdis.Kletnieks
2004-02-06 18:50 ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-06 19:02 ` Matti Aarnio
2004-02-06 19:11 ` Petr Vandrovec
2004-02-07 3:05 ` Jamie Lokier
2004-02-06 18:54 ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2004-02-06 19:01 ` somenath
2004-02-06 17:27 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-06 18:51 ` Greg KH
2004-02-08 8:31 ` Fab Tillier
2004-02-08 16:29 ` Greg KH
2004-02-08 16:51 ` Fab Tillier
2004-02-09 2:55 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-09 2:57 ` Greg KH
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-24 17:55 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-24 18:03 ` Greg KH
[not found] <mailman.1076018705.12618.linux-kernel2news@redhat.com>
2004-02-09 1:51 ` Pete Zaitcev
2004-02-08 23:43 Arnd Bergmann
2004-02-08 21:36 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-06 4:07 Perez-Gonzalez, Inaky
2004-02-05 23:09 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-05 22:55 Woodruff, Robert J
2004-02-05 22:54 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-05 22:26 Hefty, Sean
2004-02-05 22:40 ` Christoph Hellwig
2004-02-05 22:39 ` Randy.Dunlap
2004-02-05 23:19 ` Greg KH
2004-02-06 1:10 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-05 22:17 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 22:56 ` Brian Gerst
2004-02-05 22:58 ` Bernd Petrovitsch
2004-02-05 22:02 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-06 1:57 ` Troy Benjegerdes
2004-02-05 20:32 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 21:27 ` Greg KH
2004-02-05 21:56 ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-06 20:22 ` Bill Davidsen
2004-02-05 19:26 Tillier, Fabian
2004-02-05 20:27 ` Greg KH
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=yw1xoescqbr4.fsf@kth.se \
--to=mru@kth.se \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox