public inbox for linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: mru@kth.se (Måns Rullgård)
To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: printk and long long
Date: Wed, 11 Feb 2004 21:32:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <yw1xvfmdwe4s.fsf@kth.se> (raw)
In-Reply-To: c0e0gr$mcv$1@terminus.zytor.com

hpa@zytor.com (H. Peter Anvin) writes:

> Followup to:  <Pine.LNX.4.44.0402111655170.17933-100000@gaia.cela.pl>
> By author:    Maciej Zenczykowski <maze@cela.pl>
> In newsgroup: linux.dev.kernel
>>
>> On Wed, 11 Feb 2004, vda wrote:
>> 
>> > The character L specifying that a following e, E, f, g, or G
>> > conversion corresponds to a long double argument, or a following
>> > d, i, o, u, x, or X conversion corresponds to a long long argument.
>> > Note that long long is not specified in ANSI C and therefore
>> > not portable to all architectures.
>> 
>> [ personally I'd say screw the un-portable architectures ;) ]
>> Long long is here to stay.
>
> long long is C99, so it's *definitely* here to say.  The conversion specifier
> is "ll" not "L", however.

What is the proper way to deal with printing an int64_t when int64_t
can be either long or long long depending on machine?

-- 
Måns Rullgård
mru@kth.se


  reply	other threads:[~2004-02-11 20:33 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-02-11 12:49 printk and long long sting sting
2004-02-11 13:35 ` wdebruij
2004-02-11 13:48   ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-02-11 14:04     ` vda
2004-02-11 15:58       ` Maciej Zenczykowski
2004-02-11 19:41         ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-11 20:32           ` Måns Rullgård [this message]
2004-02-11 21:46             ` Chris Friesen
2004-02-11 22:38               ` Timothy Miller
2004-02-11 22:23             ` Andreas Schwab
2004-02-11 23:11               ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-11 23:53                 ` H. Peter Anvin
2004-02-11 16:59       ` Dick Streefland
2004-02-11 14:03   ` Måns Rullgård
2004-02-11 14:15     ` wdebruij
2004-02-11 15:23   ` Richard B. Johnson
2004-02-13  0:26     ` Peter Chubb
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2004-02-11 13:54 Bart Hartgers
2004-02-11 14:04 ` YOSHIFUJI Hideaki / 吉藤英明
2004-02-11 14:13 ` Andreas Schwab

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=yw1xvfmdwe4s.fsf@kth.se \
    --to=mru@kth.se \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox