From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S933460AbXCSABf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:01:35 -0400 Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org id S933510AbXCSABf (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:01:35 -0400 Received: from imx12.toshiba.co.jp ([61.202.160.132]:56611 "EHLO imx12.toshiba.co.jp" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S933460AbXCSABe (ORCPT ); Sun, 18 Mar 2007 20:01:34 -0400 Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 09:00:56 +0900 Message-ID: From: Tsutomu OWA To: Sergei Shtylyov Cc: mingo@elte.hu, linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [patch 1/6 -rt] powerpc 2.6.20-rt8: add preemption checks for NEED_RESCHED_DELAYED. In-Reply-To: <45FAEDFB.70103@ru.mvista.com> References: <45FAEDFB.70103@ru.mvista.com> User-Agent: Wanderlust/2.8.1 (Something) Emacs/20.7 Mule/4.0 (HANANOEN) Organization: Software Engineering Center, TOSHIBA. MIME-Version: 1.0 (generated by SEMI 1.14.4 - "Hosorogi") Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, At Fri, 16 Mar 2007 22:20:27 +0300, Sergei Shtylyov wrote: > Argh, I've missed this one! :-( > But shouldn't we also add !need_resched_delayed() to another place below? > > if (ppc_md.power_save) { > [...] > if (!need_resched() && !cpu_should_die()) Thanks for pointing it out. Yes, it looks like needed. -- owa