public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Tian Lan <tilan7663@gmail.com>, ming.lei@redhat.com
Cc: axboe@kernel.dk, horms@kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	lkp@intel.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev,
	oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, tian.lan@twosigma.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_hw_ctx active request accounting
Date: Mon, 15 May 2023 07:54:28 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1c9fc9df-817c-e6cb-1375-2013c0c5a9bb@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230514145328.595743-1-tilan7663@gmail.com>

On 5/14/23 16:53, Tian Lan wrote:
> From: Tian Lan <tian.lan@twosigma.com>
> 
> The nr_active counter continues to increase over time which causes the
> blk_mq_get_tag to hang until the thread is rescheduled to a different
> core despite there are still tags available.
> 
> kernel-stack
> 
>    INFO: task inboundIOReacto:3014879 blocked for more than 2 seconds
>    Not tainted 6.1.15-amd64 #1 Debian 6.1.15~debian11
>    "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
>    task:inboundIORe state:D stack:0  pid:3014879 ppid:4557 flags:0x00000000
>      Call Trace:
>      <TASK>
>      __schedule+0x351/0xa20
>      scheduler+0x5d/0xe0
>      io_schedule+0x42/0x70
>      blk_mq_get_tag+0x11a/0x2a0
>      ? dequeue_task_stop+0x70/0x70
>      __blk_mq_alloc_requests+0x191/0x2e0
> 
> kprobe output showing RQF_MQ_INFLIGHT bit is not cleared before
> __blk_mq_free_request being called.
> 
>    320    320  kworker/29:1H __blk_mq_free_request rq_flags 0x220c0
>           b'__blk_mq_free_request+0x1 [kernel]'
>           b'bt_iter+0x50 [kernel]'
>           b'blk_mq_queue_tag_busy_iter+0x318 [kernel]'
>           b'blk_mq_timeout_work+0x7c [kernel]'
>           b'process_one_work+0x1c4 [kernel]'
>           b'worker_thread+0x4d [kernel]'
>           b'kthread+0xe6 [kernel]'
>           b'ret_from_fork+0x1f [kernel]'
> 
> The issue is caused by the difference between blk_mq_free_request() and
> blk_mq_end_request_batch() wrt. when to call __blk_mq_dec_active_requests().
> The former does it before calling req_ref_put_and_test(), and the latter
> decreases the active request after req_ref_put_and_test().
> 
> - Fixes: f794f3351f26 ("block: add support for blk_mq_end_request_batch()")
> 
> Signed-off-by: Tian Lan <tian.lan@twosigma.com>
> Reviewed-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> ---
>   block/blk-mq.c | 8 ++++----
>   1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Ivo Totev, Andrew
Myers, Andrew McDonald, Martje Boudien Moerman


  reply	other threads:[~2023-05-15  5:54 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
     [not found] <20230513141234.8395-1-tilan7663@gmail.com>
2023-05-13 16:41 ` [PATCH 1/1] blk-mq: fix blk_mq_hw_ctx active request accounting kernel test robot
2023-05-13 19:05   ` Tian Lan
2023-05-13 20:54     ` Simon Horman
2023-05-13 21:15       ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-13 22:11         ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14  1:39           ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-15 12:28             ` Tian Lan
2023-05-13 22:12         ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14  1:52           ` Jens Axboe
2023-05-14 12:20             ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 22:39             ` [PATCH] " Tian Lan
2023-06-04  0:47               ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 22:39             ` [PATCH 1/1] " Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:22           ` Ming Lei
2023-05-14 14:28             ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:53             ` [PATCH] " Tian Lan
2023-05-15  5:54               ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2023-05-15 12:26                 ` Tian Lan
2023-05-25  2:12                   ` Ming Lei
2023-06-03 23:20           ` [PATCH 1/1] " Jens Axboe
2023-05-14 12:08     ` Ming Lei
2023-05-14 14:12       ` Tian Lan
2023-05-14 14:15       ` Ming Lei
2023-05-13 19:11   ` Tian Lan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1c9fc9df-817c-e6cb-1375-2013c0c5a9bb@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tian.lan@twosigma.com \
    --cc=tilan7663@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox