From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com>
Cc: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
linux-input@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH] Input: touchscreen - Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning
Date: Thu, 14 Oct 2021 13:57:57 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211014205757.3474635-1-nathan@kernel.org> (raw)
A new warning in clang points out a few places in this driver where a
bitwise OR is being used with boolean types:
drivers/input/touchscreen.c:81:17: warning: use of bitwise '|' with boolean operands [-Wbitwise-instead-of-logical]
data_present = touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-min-x",
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
This use of a bitwise OR is intentional, as bitwise operations do not
short circuit, which allows all the calls to touchscreen_get_prop_u32()
to happen so that the last parameter is initialized while coalescing the
results of the calls to make a decision after they are all evaluated.
To make this clearer to the compiler, use the '|=' operator to assign
the result of each touchscreen_get_prop_u32() call to data_present,
which keeps the meaning of the code the same but makes it obvious that
every one of these calls is expected to happen.
Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1472
Signed-off-by: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
---
drivers/input/touchscreen.c | 42 ++++++++++++++++++-------------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/input/touchscreen.c b/drivers/input/touchscreen.c
index dd18cb917c4d..4620e20d0190 100644
--- a/drivers/input/touchscreen.c
+++ b/drivers/input/touchscreen.c
@@ -80,27 +80,27 @@ void touchscreen_parse_properties(struct input_dev *input, bool multitouch,
data_present = touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-min-x",
input_abs_get_min(input, axis_x),
- &minimum) |
- touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-size-x",
- input_abs_get_max(input,
- axis_x) + 1,
- &maximum) |
- touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-fuzz-x",
- input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis_x),
- &fuzz);
+ &minimum);
+ data_present |= touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-size-x",
+ input_abs_get_max(input,
+ axis_x) + 1,
+ &maximum);
+ data_present |= touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-fuzz-x",
+ input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis_x),
+ &fuzz);
if (data_present)
touchscreen_set_params(input, axis_x, minimum, maximum - 1, fuzz);
data_present = touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-min-y",
input_abs_get_min(input, axis_y),
- &minimum) |
- touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-size-y",
- input_abs_get_max(input,
- axis_y) + 1,
- &maximum) |
- touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-fuzz-y",
- input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis_y),
- &fuzz);
+ &minimum);
+ data_present |= touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-size-y",
+ input_abs_get_max(input,
+ axis_y) + 1,
+ &maximum);
+ data_present |= touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev, "touchscreen-fuzz-y",
+ input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis_y),
+ &fuzz);
if (data_present)
touchscreen_set_params(input, axis_y, minimum, maximum - 1, fuzz);
@@ -108,11 +108,11 @@ void touchscreen_parse_properties(struct input_dev *input, bool multitouch,
data_present = touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev,
"touchscreen-max-pressure",
input_abs_get_max(input, axis),
- &maximum) |
- touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev,
- "touchscreen-fuzz-pressure",
- input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis),
- &fuzz);
+ &maximum);
+ data_present |= touchscreen_get_prop_u32(dev,
+ "touchscreen-fuzz-pressure",
+ input_abs_get_fuzz(input, axis),
+ &fuzz);
if (data_present)
touchscreen_set_params(input, axis, 0, maximum, fuzz);
base-commit: a41392e0877a271007e9209e63c34cab7527eb43
--
2.33.1.637.gf443b226ca
next reply other threads:[~2021-10-14 20:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-10-14 20:57 Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2021-10-14 21:02 ` [PATCH] Input: touchscreen - Avoid bitwise vs logical OR warning Nick Desaulniers
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211014205757.3474635-1-nathan@kernel.org \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox