From: Jisheng Zhang <jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn>
To: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
Cc: Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>,
Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@markovi.net>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] riscv: consolidate __ex_table construction
Date: Wed, 20 Oct 2021 22:03:19 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20211020220319.41ad167f@xhacker> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202110180820.HH9NB6vw-lkp@intel.com>
On Mon, 18 Oct 2021 08:14:28 +0800
kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com> wrote:
> Hi Jisheng,
>
> I love your patch! Yet something to improve:
>
> [auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
> [also build test ERROR on v5.15-rc5 next-20211015]
> [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
> And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
> https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
>
> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Jisheng-Zhang/riscv-switch-to-relative-extable/20211017-001318
> base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 8fe31e0995f048d16b378b90926793a0aa4af1e5
> config: riscv-randconfig-r032-20211017 (attached as .config)
> compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 746dd6a700931988dd9021d3d04718f1929885a5)
> reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
> wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
> chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
> # install riscv cross compiling tool for clang build
> # apt-get install binutils-riscv64-linux-gnu
> # https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/23c273bf6ec4ca672a21dba701725087208dc784
> git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
> git fetch --no-tags linux-review Jisheng-Zhang/riscv-switch-to-relative-extable/20211017-001318
> git checkout 23c273bf6ec4ca672a21dba701725087208dc784
> # save the attached .config to linux build tree
> mkdir build_dir
> COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=riscv SHELL=/bin/bash
>
> If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
> Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
>
> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>
> In file included from kernel/futex.c:36:
> In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
> In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
> In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
> include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:36:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
> #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
> ^
> In file included from kernel/futex.c:36:
> In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
> In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
> In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
> include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:34:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
> #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
> ^
> In file included from kernel/futex.c:36:
> In file included from include/linux/pagemap.h:11:
> In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10:
> In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11:
> In file included from ./arch/riscv/include/generated/asm/hardirq.h:1:
> In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17:
> In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20:
> In file included from include/linux/io.h:13:
> In file included from arch/riscv/include/asm/io.h:136:
> include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
The warnings like this are not caused by this patch, they existed for a long
time since NOMMU is supported. But no good solution so far.
> include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> include/asm-generic/io.h:1024:55: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
> return (port > MMIO_UPPER_LIMIT) ? NULL : PCI_IOBASE + port;
> ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
> In file included from kernel/futex.c:43:
> >> arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h:51:3: error: expected ')'
> __futex_atomic_op("amoswap.w.aqrl %[ov],%z[op],%[u]",
> ^
> arch/riscv/include/asm/futex.h:33:3: note: expanded from macro '__futex_atomic_op'
> _ASM_EXTABLE(1b, 3b) \
> ^
Errors like this are caused by my patch, I missed NOMMU. Fixed in V2.
Thanks
prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-20 14:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20211017000443.4275747d@xhacker>
2021-10-18 0:14 ` [PATCH 1/2] riscv: consolidate __ex_table construction kernel test robot
2021-10-20 14:03 ` Jisheng Zhang [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20211020220319.41ad167f@xhacker \
--to=jszhang3@mail.ustc.edu.cn \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.lkml@markovi.net \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=palmer@dabbelt.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox