From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>, mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
Geliang Tang <geliang.tang@suse.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH mptcp-next] Squash to "mptcp: infinite mapping receiving"
Date: Thu, 21 Oct 2021 21:42:11 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202110212124.LLGxLRSx-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <39044f0b1da24b4228ed186a751b893a94e9d56b.1634796076.git.geliang.tang@suse.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 7648 bytes --]
Hi Geliang,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.15-rc6 next-20211021]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Geliang-Tang/Squash-to-mptcp-infinite-mapping-receiving/20211021-140855
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 2f111a6fd5b5297b4e92f53798ca086f7c7d33a4
config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20211021 (attached as .config)
compiler: clang version 14.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 3cea2505fd8d99a9ba0cb625aecfe28a47c4e3f8)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commit/ca85326898507008f999c544140bfcecb30316b3
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/0day-ci/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Geliang-Tang/Squash-to-mptcp-infinite-mapping-receiving/20211021-140855
git checkout ca85326898507008f999c544140bfcecb30316b3
# save the attached .config to linux build tree
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 ARCH=hexagon
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag as appropriate
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> net/mptcp/subflow.c:941:36: error: implicit declaration of function 'mptcp_check_infinite_map' [-Werror,-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (mptcp_check_fallback(ssk) && !mptcp_check_infinite_map(skb))
^
1 error generated.
--
net/mptcp/options.c:566:21: warning: parameter 'remaining' set but not used [-Wunused-but-set-parameter]
unsigned int remaining,
^
>> net/mptcp/options.c:1218:11: error: no member named 'infinite_map' in 'struct mptcp_ext'
mpext->infinite_map = 1;
~~~~~ ^
1 warning and 1 error generated.
vim +/mptcp_check_infinite_map +941 net/mptcp/subflow.c
926
927 static enum mapping_status get_mapping_status(struct sock *ssk,
928 struct mptcp_sock *msk)
929 {
930 struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow = mptcp_subflow_ctx(ssk);
931 bool csum_reqd = READ_ONCE(msk->csum_enabled);
932 struct mptcp_ext *mpext;
933 struct sk_buff *skb;
934 u16 data_len;
935 u64 map_seq;
936
937 skb = skb_peek(&ssk->sk_receive_queue);
938 if (!skb)
939 return MAPPING_EMPTY;
940
> 941 if (mptcp_check_fallback(ssk) && !mptcp_check_infinite_map(skb))
942 return MAPPING_DUMMY;
943
944 mpext = mptcp_get_ext(skb);
945 if (!mpext || !mpext->use_map) {
946 if (!subflow->map_valid && !skb->len) {
947 /* the TCP stack deliver 0 len FIN pkt to the receive
948 * queue, that is the only 0len pkts ever expected here,
949 * and we can admit no mapping only for 0 len pkts
950 */
951 if (!(TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags & TCPHDR_FIN))
952 WARN_ONCE(1, "0len seq %d:%d flags %x",
953 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->seq,
954 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->end_seq,
955 TCP_SKB_CB(skb)->tcp_flags);
956 sk_eat_skb(ssk, skb);
957 return MAPPING_EMPTY;
958 }
959
960 if (!subflow->map_valid)
961 return MAPPING_INVALID;
962
963 goto validate_seq;
964 }
965
966 trace_get_mapping_status(mpext);
967
968 data_len = mpext->data_len;
969 if (data_len == 0) {
970 MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_INFINITEMAPRX);
971 return MAPPING_INVALID;
972 }
973
974 if (mpext->data_fin == 1) {
975 if (data_len == 1) {
976 bool updated = mptcp_update_rcv_data_fin(msk, mpext->data_seq,
977 mpext->dsn64);
978 pr_debug("DATA_FIN with no payload seq=%llu", mpext->data_seq);
979 if (subflow->map_valid) {
980 /* A DATA_FIN might arrive in a DSS
981 * option before the previous mapping
982 * has been fully consumed. Continue
983 * handling the existing mapping.
984 */
985 skb_ext_del(skb, SKB_EXT_MPTCP);
986 return MAPPING_OK;
987 } else {
988 if (updated && schedule_work(&msk->work))
989 sock_hold((struct sock *)msk);
990
991 return MAPPING_DATA_FIN;
992 }
993 } else {
994 u64 data_fin_seq = mpext->data_seq + data_len - 1;
995
996 /* If mpext->data_seq is a 32-bit value, data_fin_seq
997 * must also be limited to 32 bits.
998 */
999 if (!mpext->dsn64)
1000 data_fin_seq &= GENMASK_ULL(31, 0);
1001
1002 mptcp_update_rcv_data_fin(msk, data_fin_seq, mpext->dsn64);
1003 pr_debug("DATA_FIN with mapping seq=%llu dsn64=%d",
1004 data_fin_seq, mpext->dsn64);
1005 }
1006
1007 /* Adjust for DATA_FIN using 1 byte of sequence space */
1008 data_len--;
1009 }
1010
1011 map_seq = mptcp_expand_seq(READ_ONCE(msk->ack_seq), mpext->data_seq, mpext->dsn64);
1012 WRITE_ONCE(mptcp_sk(subflow->conn)->use_64bit_ack, !!mpext->dsn64);
1013
1014 if (subflow->map_valid) {
1015 /* Allow replacing only with an identical map */
1016 if (subflow->map_seq == map_seq &&
1017 subflow->map_subflow_seq == mpext->subflow_seq &&
1018 subflow->map_data_len == data_len &&
1019 subflow->map_csum_reqd == mpext->csum_reqd) {
1020 skb_ext_del(skb, SKB_EXT_MPTCP);
1021 goto validate_csum;
1022 }
1023
1024 /* If this skb data are fully covered by the current mapping,
1025 * the new map would need caching, which is not supported
1026 */
1027 if (skb_is_fully_mapped(ssk, skb)) {
1028 MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_DSSNOMATCH);
1029 return MAPPING_INVALID;
1030 }
1031
1032 /* will validate the next map after consuming the current one */
1033 goto validate_csum;
1034 }
1035
1036 subflow->map_seq = map_seq;
1037 subflow->map_subflow_seq = mpext->subflow_seq;
1038 subflow->map_data_len = data_len;
1039 subflow->map_valid = 1;
1040 subflow->map_data_fin = mpext->data_fin;
1041 subflow->mpc_map = mpext->mpc_map;
1042 subflow->map_csum_reqd = mpext->csum_reqd;
1043 subflow->map_csum_len = 0;
1044 subflow->map_data_csum = csum_unfold(mpext->csum);
1045
1046 /* Cfr RFC 8684 Section 3.3.0 */
1047 if (unlikely(subflow->map_csum_reqd != csum_reqd))
1048 return MAPPING_INVALID;
1049
1050 pr_debug("new map seq=%llu subflow_seq=%u data_len=%u csum=%d:%u",
1051 subflow->map_seq, subflow->map_subflow_seq,
1052 subflow->map_data_len, subflow->map_csum_reqd,
1053 subflow->map_data_csum);
1054
1055 validate_seq:
1056 /* we revalidate valid mapping on new skb, because we must ensure
1057 * the current skb is completely covered by the available mapping
1058 */
1059 if (!validate_mapping(ssk, skb)) {
1060 MPTCP_INC_STATS(sock_net(ssk), MPTCP_MIB_DSSTCPMISMATCH);
1061 return MAPPING_INVALID;
1062 }
1063
1064 skb_ext_del(skb, SKB_EXT_MPTCP);
1065
1066 validate_csum:
1067 return validate_data_csum(ssk, skb, csum_reqd);
1068 }
1069
---
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service, Intel Corporation
https://lists.01.org/hyperkitty/list/kbuild-all@lists.01.org
[-- Attachment #2: .config.gz --]
[-- Type: application/gzip, Size: 28085 bytes --]
parent reply other threads:[~2021-10-21 13:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
[parent not found: <39044f0b1da24b4228ed186a751b893a94e9d56b.1634796076.git.geliang.tang@suse.com>]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202110212124.LLGxLRSx-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=geliang.tang@suse.com \
--cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox