From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 02D6C2C82 for ; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:50:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 8579260F6E; Tue, 23 Nov 2021 17:50:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1637689857; bh=WKYNL/9N4GLwSGaYzXyap1kJP+9X+sVzPH05htv7clA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=V6U6e9MgkAYnsnIO+DSA3NrAKsGAOfMp0wZn2nMFl90IUs64nYbZIbKLY1gD5wp12 67mh/o0SUUB/iRaqZbTnb0ZaJKW3jS2b4zRq8Howfp1u2ynDyLjLqV2zZ+PyElUh3b DC2IYHJBkPO7oqwZqWpMAHXOlDA5B9J46PsNTVYYp4gLRueh7UX/vKO+0auyBF5f0+ OREYTJrhj1Wqnx6slyv7zfht/oLFKhGcE8YOHQOQk/epeBMpyStqDiR33IlHAv+Kcn c6nHBYz/jgvPDTt2adkLGOXv025F88j9WxgwtKF/4OcQD2b49LwK9GQQUGRc97GYq2 D8iyyK38YeGbA== Date: Tue, 23 Nov 2021 11:56:10 -0600 From: "Gustavo A. R. Silva" To: Joe Perches Cc: kernel test robot , llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Kees Cook , Nathan Chancellor Subject: Re: arch/mips/mm/tlbex.c:2243:3: warning: unannotated fall-through between switch labels Message-ID: <20211123175610.GA8713@embeddedor> References: <202111230719.OZDUHU4z-lkp@intel.com> <20211123005528.GA550759@embeddedor> <20211123165057.GA7382@embeddedor> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 09:25:17AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > On Tue, 2021-11-23 at 10:50 -0600, Gustavo A. R. Silva wrote: > > On Tue, Nov 23, 2021 at 12:52:30AM -0800, Joe Perches wrote: > > > > > > Perhaps this would be better: > > > > Feel free to send a proper patch. > > I commented on your proposed patch. And I reply giving you an option if you want to proceed. > And I'd prefer you actually look at and improve the code instead > of merely silencing warnings. If this is a matter of preference then I should express my preferences, too. So, I prefer to give you the opportunity of improving the code and not being pedantic at the same time. :) Thanks -- Gustavo >