From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pf1-f169.google.com (mail-pf1-f169.google.com [209.85.210.169]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3529F68 for ; Wed, 1 Dec 2021 19:41:19 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pf1-f169.google.com with SMTP id o4so25575181pfp.13 for ; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:19 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=N/c4XBzpAhfh2fxIk2nQwH9IJv2DHkpMOkPrtJqbaqM=; b=dsiSvgd8t9Py/T3ZMYz6xVEjcpefT6ANJp1ZgG2dPTBQcClq6XSD22WnMaNmJ+3HSw VL7WlY/6MsaGanSDA/J8kLW2Q6zo9mP3WubF9BCQb4xX/EJBjG7nsFuUDTQ8302491dR 8izBQ0e07WFR3Dkczk8Fqza/sytMMahJUbi0M= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=N/c4XBzpAhfh2fxIk2nQwH9IJv2DHkpMOkPrtJqbaqM=; b=2LlnkPCsbgt9+iLzAjzqhPYB8ffOwqyrNB/l7DFE3jHriUw/T0Obqq4xIiUkAatSHz MKzUMTRtSNRrsRSyC4WPMThe7c/cvd2iPLloVk8yja76Ha3I2PVmz/Lwb0Ri3k8rZALy DmH+gOF3Nt7BNvjasfRWXfg4DueKjk6Wlv0NfUHYR2kNIvCL0M15XJFzeLrxIkrhr+Wz HvkbJDpey92kcMMAQKls8SJLnxQMiQ6jWp4OOSmuy/XHT5vKUvUi3QQelA6JaykumXbA V5lIhAhJzf/1XDXCIG4fms+ZwMmSaQSMuT/C8Esq/To0AQFW5zO8GxBk8SdJ73Btp5BR vc1g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532tUGktXeRVMEyeHEbz7iUSXveUNyKUC8Qt9Trx9VOymA68VHcf UwMTLSAapppCOqPQo9hRcb5liQ== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJwnrkf5VV8lOR8ofvTy2eEtkrOUbvs6jU3Ueml81H0PE/585+9TxwtaKPip2KS4chmI1tUn0g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6a00:2ab:b0:49f:997e:23e2 with SMTP id q11-20020a056a0002ab00b0049f997e23e2mr8130898pfs.22.1638387678756; Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d2sm647466pfj.42.2021.12.01.11.41.18 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 01 Dec 2021 11:41:18 -0800 (PST) Date: Wed, 1 Dec 2021 11:41:17 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Nathan Chancellor Cc: Nick Desaulniers , Andrew Morton , Arnd Bergmann , Masahiro Yamada , Miguel Ojeda , Sami Tolvanen , Tom Stellard , Michael Ellerman , Naresh Kamboju , Jakub Kicinski , cki-project@redhat.com, kernelci@groups.io, llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/6] Bump minimum supported version of LLVM to 11.0.0 Message-ID: <202112011140.DA93B3E@keescook> References: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20211129165803.470795-1-nathan@kernel.org> On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 09:57:57AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote: > This patch series raises the minimum supported version of LLVM to > 11.0.0. > > Patch #1 outlines the issue, goes over the potential impact of the > change, and does the actual bump. Subsequent patches clean up the > various checks that are always true after the bump. > > I have marked this revision as RFC to give various parties the option to > comment on this bump before it is done, namely KernelCI and Linaro's > LKFT, who are still testing clang-10. I have added some other folks to > CC that I know are testing with clang to see if this impacts them in any > way (as I would like to impact as few people as possible) but as far as > I am aware, most other CIs and developers are testing closer to tip of > tree. If that is not true, scream so that we can see what can be done > about that. If I missed anyone who is actively testing with clang, > please key them in and I will make sure to include them in future > revisions (if any are needed). > > It probably makes sense for this series to live in -mm. Sounds good to me. Thanks! Reviewed-by: Kees Cook -- Kees Cook