From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-pl1-f178.google.com (mail-pl1-f178.google.com [209.85.214.178]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 21A34369B for ; Sat, 26 Feb 2022 04:58:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-pl1-f178.google.com with SMTP id bd1so6398116plb.13 for ; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 20:58:05 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=chromium.org; s=google; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5WDq2AfJRdEk3uwNCX9CCL0Qxk/1zT3oEVQ37zTBxiQ=; b=c3aDV/sWGC8Aav0gTokKYXKTVE9bAzdOg/VodTQkI1ZuWDFLBaAapUK41ly/1s3IY/ W+Z6/i2+AiHX1zTPTIWN0fxwS7weXUa9htEgesB3a3/aUvLro2QbUvmJvb7PuCo8MDxY cWLiWBjaqvM9w53HJp7E2yo9+WCoeGP3wPwnw= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=x-gm-message-state:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references :mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to; bh=5WDq2AfJRdEk3uwNCX9CCL0Qxk/1zT3oEVQ37zTBxiQ=; b=R4fiXtcpa1zbzm6Jb7DHiHHQAo7ZdBGrA2Ko9zycWgJtU74SL3jFMaydqmM+wLVuSa 1qGgTS5kjAhNnvpn0mudF4kSuXoiqI1eSzOHXvsn+y0Od127aiu5X8YcGYpt21tpnj/V bj/WGk2UNFLRphsRaF97sg/IcRRYmINEbsWJ5wbTKuyDGX7Olg0H85X2ExYQSeMibLKQ dUsEzPKfa6oFiNw+SsXCliBmdTZwA7IG1gGwYGH3Zc52usnlisDQduKl4hHYT9iBd6hf qo3QKMy1crpoKm8eS2JUqh1OQ9LJpCa5eTOzKPWy/nfNCHO+g39zJdJfkTMGUJstIGSW yG/g== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM532kXpx0ctC1JnOCAWdClLRvKUDMtolcolagtlXCWSP3BbalfMxL 1k0Kh7W+pqZKJ3Jg0Vub4MTKRw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJw+Pq5ORed8exj9wiY5jEUAPWkvWhs95qMwc9/ZjM7l7Vq7hTKWaYi8/0ifVsSFdaFo8S2A8g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:6a45:b0:1bc:5899:c960 with SMTP id d5-20020a17090a6a4500b001bc5899c960mr6431453pjm.128.1645851484628; Fri, 25 Feb 2022 20:58:04 -0800 (PST) Received: from www.outflux.net (smtp.outflux.net. [198.145.64.163]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v3-20020a17090a088300b001bc76ed4ad9sm11129598pjc.9.2022.02.25.20.58.04 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Fri, 25 Feb 2022 20:58:04 -0800 (PST) Date: Fri, 25 Feb 2022 20:58:03 -0800 From: Kees Cook To: Joao Moreira , Fangrui Song Cc: Nathan Chancellor , Peter Zijlstra , x86@kernel.org, hjl.tools@gmail.com, jpoimboe@redhat.com, andrew.cooper3@citrix.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com, samitolvanen@google.com, mark.rutland@arm.com, alyssa.milburn@intel.com, mbenes@suse.cz, rostedt@goodmis.org, mhiramat@kernel.org, alexei.starovoitov@gmail.com, llvm@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 05/39] x86: Base IBT bits Message-ID: <202202252055.AB16A4B8@keescook> References: <20220224145138.952963315@infradead.org> <20220224151322.307406918@infradead.org> <202202241627.EEF3D5D2@keescook> <605731324a76f36aafa87bd9390808c3@overdrivepizza.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <605731324a76f36aafa87bd9390808c3@overdrivepizza.com> On Fri, Feb 25, 2022 at 04:29:49PM -0800, Joao Moreira wrote: > > https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1606 > > Candidate fix: https://reviews.llvm.org/D120600 And landed! Thanks! Since this is a pretty small change, do you think it could be backported to the clang-14 branch? -- Kees Cook