llvm.lists.linux.dev archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
To: broonie@kernel.org, nathan@kernel.org, ndesaulniers@google.com,
	paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com
Cc: linux-spi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
Subject: [PATCH] spi: initialize status to success
Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2022 16:51:32 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220416205132.295779-1-trix@redhat.com> (raw)

Clang static analysis reports this issue
spi.c:3583:2: warning: 2nd function call argument
  is an uninitialized value
  trace_spi_setup(spi, status);
  ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

It is possible that status is never set because
its function level setting was removed by the
commit listed in the Fixes: tag.

Assume that setting 8 bits-per-word is ok and
initialize the status to 0.

Fixes: b3fe2e516741 ("spi: core: Only check bits_per_word validity when explicitly provided")
Signed-off-by: Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>
---
 drivers/spi/spi.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/drivers/spi/spi.c b/drivers/spi/spi.c
index 563a56ce34a0..890ff46c784a 100644
--- a/drivers/spi/spi.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi.c
@@ -3475,7 +3475,7 @@ static int __spi_validate_bits_per_word(struct spi_controller *ctlr,
 int spi_setup(struct spi_device *spi)
 {
 	unsigned	bad_bits, ugly_bits;
-	int		status;
+	int		status = 0;
 
 	/*
 	 * Check mode to prevent that any two of DUAL, QUAD and NO_MOSI/MISO
-- 
2.27.0


             reply	other threads:[~2022-04-16 20:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-04-16 20:51 Tom Rix [this message]
2022-04-16 23:05 ` [PATCH] spi: initialize status to success Nathan Chancellor
2022-04-17 19:37 ` Mark Brown

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220416205132.295779-1-trix@redhat.com \
    --to=trix@redhat.com \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-spi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=paul.kocialkowski@bootlin.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).