public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
	Sami Tolvanen <samitolvanen@google.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-next@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees
Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2022 09:16:34 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20220616091634.55ebbdb0@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <Yqo5SequJuC2qX6S@dev-arch.thelio-3990X>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 2627 bytes --]

Hi Nathan,

On Wed, 15 Jun 2022 12:55:53 -0700 Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org> wrote:
>
> There is a contextual conflict between commit e1d337335207 ("cfi: Fix
> __cfi_slowpath_diag RCU usage with cpuidle") in the kspp tree and commit
> dcc0c11aa87b ("rcu/context-tracking: Remove rcu_irq_enter/exit()") in
> the rcu tree, which is visible when building ARCH=arm64 defconfig +
> CONFIG_LTO_CLANG_THIN=y + CONFIG_CFI_CLANG=y with clang:
> 
>   kernel/cfi.c:298:3: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_irq_enter'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>                   rcu_irq_enter();
>                   ^
>   kernel/cfi.c:298:3: note: did you mean 'ct_irq_enter'?
>   ./include/linux/context_tracking_irq.h:6:6: note: 'ct_irq_enter' declared here
>   void ct_irq_enter(void);
>        ^
>   kernel/cfi.c:307:3: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_irq_exit'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
>                   rcu_irq_exit();
>                   ^
>   kernel/cfi.c:307:3: note: did you mean 'ct_irq_exit'?
>   ./include/linux/context_tracking_irq.h:7:6: note: 'ct_irq_exit' declared here
>   void ct_irq_exit(void);
>        ^
>   2 errors generated.
> 
> 
> Per the above RCU commit and commit 6c5218715286 ("context_tracking:
> Take IRQ eqs entrypoints over RCU"), it appears that the following diff
> is the proper fix up. Would you mind applying it to the merge of
> whichever tree comes second if possible? I did build and boot test it
> but it would not be a bad idea for Sami and Frederic to verify that it
> is correct so that Kees/Paul can mention it to Linus :)
> 
> Cheers,
> Nathan
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/cfi.c b/kernel/cfi.c
> index 08102d19ec15..2046276ee234 100644
> --- a/kernel/cfi.c
> +++ b/kernel/cfi.c
> @@ -295,7 +295,7 @@ static inline cfi_check_fn find_check_fn(unsigned long ptr)
>  	rcu_idle = !rcu_is_watching();
>  	if (rcu_idle) {
>  		local_irq_save(flags);
> -		rcu_irq_enter();
> +		ct_irq_enter();
>  	}
>  
>  	if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_CFI_CLANG_SHADOW))
> @@ -304,7 +304,7 @@ static inline cfi_check_fn find_check_fn(unsigned long ptr)
>  		fn = find_module_check_fn(ptr);
>  
>  	if (rcu_idle) {
> -		rcu_irq_exit();
> +		ct_irq_exit();
>  		local_irq_restore(flags);
>  	}
>  

I will apply that to the merge of the rcu tree today (unless Paul finds
time to update (and test :-) ) the rcu tree before I get to it) as the
CFI fix is now in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2022-06-15 23:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-06-15 19:55 Contextual conflict between kspp and rcu trees Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-15 20:25 ` Kees Cook
2022-06-15 20:28 ` Kees Cook
2022-06-15 20:34   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 20:35   ` Nathan Chancellor
2022-06-15 21:12     ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:09       ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-06-15 20:30 ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-15 23:16 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2022-06-16  1:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2022-06-16  1:40     ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20220616091634.55ebbdb0@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=frederic@kernel.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=samitolvanen@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox