* Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] rcuscale: Add test for using call_rcu_lazy() to emulate kfree_rcu()
[not found] <20220622225102.2112026-8-joel@joelfernandes.org>
@ 2022-06-23 2:09 ` kernel test robot
2022-06-23 3:00 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-23 2:09 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Fernandes (Google), rcu
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, linux-kernel, rushikesh.s.kadam, urezki,
neeraj.iitr10, frederic, paulmck, rostedt, vineeth,
Joel Fernandes (Google)
Hi "Joel,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.19-rc3 next-20220622]
[cannot apply to paulmck-rcu/dev]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joel-Fernandes-Google/Implement-call_rcu_lazy-and-miscellaneous-fixes/20220623-065447
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git de5c208d533a46a074eb46ea17f672cc005a7269
config: hexagon-randconfig-r045-20220622 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220623/202206230936.goRWmVwu-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 46be5faaf03466c3751f8a2882bef5a217e15926)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6c59cb940f39b882c20e6858c41df7c1470b930a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Joel-Fernandes-Google/Implement-call_rcu_lazy-and-miscellaneous-fixes/20220623-065447
git checkout 6c59cb940f39b882c20e6858c41df7c1470b930a
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=hexagon SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/rcu/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:663:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'kfree_rcu_lazy' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void kfree_rcu_lazy(struct rcu_head *rh)
^
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:663:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void kfree_rcu_lazy(struct rcu_head *rh)
^
static
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:789:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'call_rcu_lazy_test1' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
void call_rcu_lazy_test1(struct rcu_head *rh)
^
kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:789:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
void call_rcu_lazy_test1(struct rcu_head *rh)
^
static
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:810:14: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
orig_jif = rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush();
^
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:813:3: error: call to undeclared function 'rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush(2 * HZ);
^
2 warnings and 2 errors generated.
vim +/rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush +810 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
661
662 /* Used if doing RCU-kfree'ing via call_rcu_lazy(). */
> 663 void kfree_rcu_lazy(struct rcu_head *rh)
664 {
665 struct kfree_obj *obj = container_of(rh, struct kfree_obj, rh);
666 kfree(obj);
667 }
668
669 static int
670 kfree_scale_thread(void *arg)
671 {
672 int i, loop = 0;
673 long me = (long)arg;
674 struct kfree_obj *alloc_ptr;
675 u64 start_time, end_time;
676 long long mem_begin, mem_during = 0;
677 bool kfree_rcu_test_both;
678 DEFINE_TORTURE_RANDOM(tr);
679
680 VERBOSE_SCALEOUT_STRING("kfree_scale_thread task started");
681 set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(me % nr_cpu_ids));
682 set_user_nice(current, MAX_NICE);
683 kfree_rcu_test_both = (kfree_rcu_test_single == kfree_rcu_test_double);
684
685 start_time = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
686
687 if (atomic_inc_return(&n_kfree_scale_thread_started) >= kfree_nrealthreads) {
688 if (gp_exp)
689 b_rcu_gp_test_started = cur_ops->exp_completed() / 2;
690 else
691 b_rcu_gp_test_started = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
692 }
693
694 do {
695 if (!mem_during) {
696 mem_during = mem_begin = si_mem_available();
697 } else if (loop % (kfree_loops / 4) == 0) {
698 mem_during = (mem_during + si_mem_available()) / 2;
699 }
700
701 for (i = 0; i < kfree_alloc_num; i++) {
702 alloc_ptr = kmalloc(kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj), GFP_KERNEL);
703 if (!alloc_ptr)
704 return -ENOMEM;
705
706 if (kfree_rcu_by_lazy) {
707 call_rcu_lazy(&(alloc_ptr->rh), kfree_rcu_lazy);
708 continue;
709 }
710
711 // By default kfree_rcu_test_single and kfree_rcu_test_double are
712 // initialized to false. If both have the same value (false or true)
713 // both are randomly tested, otherwise only the one with value true
714 // is tested.
715 if ((kfree_rcu_test_single && !kfree_rcu_test_double) ||
716 (kfree_rcu_test_both && torture_random(&tr) & 0x800))
717 kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr);
718 else
719 kfree_rcu(alloc_ptr, rh);
720 }
721
722 cond_resched();
723 } while (!torture_must_stop() && ++loop < kfree_loops);
724
725 if (atomic_inc_return(&n_kfree_scale_thread_ended) >= kfree_nrealthreads) {
726 end_time = ktime_get_mono_fast_ns();
727
728 if (gp_exp)
729 b_rcu_gp_test_finished = cur_ops->exp_completed() / 2;
730 else
731 b_rcu_gp_test_finished = cur_ops->get_gp_seq();
732
733 pr_alert("Total time taken by all kfree'ers: %llu ns, loops: %d, batches: %ld, memory footprint: %lldMB\n",
734 (unsigned long long)(end_time - start_time), kfree_loops,
735 rcuscale_seq_diff(b_rcu_gp_test_finished, b_rcu_gp_test_started),
736 (mem_begin - mem_during) >> (20 - PAGE_SHIFT));
737
738 if (shutdown) {
739 smp_mb(); /* Assign before wake. */
740 wake_up(&shutdown_wq);
741 }
742 }
743
744 torture_kthread_stopping("kfree_scale_thread");
745 return 0;
746 }
747
748 static void
749 kfree_scale_cleanup(void)
750 {
751 int i;
752
753 if (kfree_rcu_by_lazy)
754 rcu_force_call_rcu_to_lazy(false);
755
756 if (torture_cleanup_begin())
757 return;
758
759 if (kfree_reader_tasks) {
760 for (i = 0; i < kfree_nrealthreads; i++)
761 torture_stop_kthread(kfree_scale_thread,
762 kfree_reader_tasks[i]);
763 kfree(kfree_reader_tasks);
764 }
765
766 torture_cleanup_end();
767 }
768
769 /*
770 * shutdown kthread. Just waits to be awakened, then shuts down system.
771 */
772 static int
773 kfree_scale_shutdown(void *arg)
774 {
775 wait_event(shutdown_wq,
776 atomic_read(&n_kfree_scale_thread_ended) >= kfree_nrealthreads);
777
778 smp_mb(); /* Wake before output. */
779
780 kfree_scale_cleanup();
781 kernel_power_off();
782 return -EINVAL;
783 }
784
785 // Used if doing RCU-kfree'ing via call_rcu_lazy().
786 unsigned long jiffies_at_lazy_cb;
787 struct rcu_head lazy_test1_rh;
788 int rcu_lazy_test1_cb_called;
> 789 void call_rcu_lazy_test1(struct rcu_head *rh)
790 {
791 jiffies_at_lazy_cb = jiffies;
792 WRITE_ONCE(rcu_lazy_test1_cb_called, 1);
793 }
794
795 static int __init
796 kfree_scale_init(void)
797 {
798 long i;
799 int firsterr = 0;
800 unsigned long orig_jif, jif_start;
801
802 // Force all call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() so that non-lazy CBs
803 // do not remove laziness of the lazy ones (since the test tries
804 // to stress call_rcu_lazy() for OOM).
805 //
806 // Also, do a quick self-test to ensure laziness is as much as
807 // expected.
808 if (kfree_rcu_by_lazy) {
809 /* do a test to check the timeout. */
> 810 orig_jif = rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush();
811
812 rcu_force_call_rcu_to_lazy(true);
> 813 rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush(2 * HZ);
814 rcu_barrier();
815
816 jif_start = jiffies;
817 jiffies_at_lazy_cb = 0;
818 call_rcu_lazy(&lazy_test1_rh, call_rcu_lazy_test1);
819
820 smp_cond_load_relaxed(&rcu_lazy_test1_cb_called, VAL == 1);
821
822 rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush(orig_jif);
823
824 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) {
825 pr_alert("Lazy CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n");
826 return -1;
827 }
828
829 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start > 3 * HZ)) {
830 pr_alert("Lazy CBs are being too lazy!\n");
831 return -1;
832 }
833 }
834
835 kfree_nrealthreads = compute_real(kfree_nthreads);
836 /* Start up the kthreads. */
837 if (shutdown) {
838 init_waitqueue_head(&shutdown_wq);
839 firsterr = torture_create_kthread(kfree_scale_shutdown, NULL,
840 shutdown_task);
841 if (torture_init_error(firsterr))
842 goto unwind;
843 schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
844 }
845
846 pr_alert("kfree object size=%zu, kfree_rcu_by_lazy=%d\n",
847 kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj),
848 kfree_rcu_by_lazy);
849
850 kfree_reader_tasks = kcalloc(kfree_nrealthreads, sizeof(kfree_reader_tasks[0]),
851 GFP_KERNEL);
852 if (kfree_reader_tasks == NULL) {
853 firsterr = -ENOMEM;
854 goto unwind;
855 }
856
857 for (i = 0; i < kfree_nrealthreads; i++) {
858 firsterr = torture_create_kthread(kfree_scale_thread, (void *)i,
859 kfree_reader_tasks[i]);
860 if (torture_init_error(firsterr))
861 goto unwind;
862 }
863
864 while (atomic_read(&n_kfree_scale_thread_started) < kfree_nrealthreads)
865 schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
866
867 torture_init_end();
868 return 0;
869
870 unwind:
871 torture_init_end();
872 kfree_scale_cleanup();
873 return firsterr;
874 }
875
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread* Re: [PATCH v2 6/8] rcuscale: Add test for using call_rcu_lazy() to emulate kfree_rcu()
[not found] <20220622225102.2112026-8-joel@joelfernandes.org>
2022-06-23 2:09 ` [PATCH v2 6/8] rcuscale: Add test for using call_rcu_lazy() to emulate kfree_rcu() kernel test robot
@ 2022-06-23 3:00 ` kernel test robot
1 sibling, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2022-06-23 3:00 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Joel Fernandes (Google), rcu
Cc: llvm, kbuild-all, linux-kernel, rushikesh.s.kadam, urezki,
neeraj.iitr10, frederic, paulmck, rostedt, vineeth,
Joel Fernandes (Google)
Hi "Joel,
Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v5.19-rc3 next-20220622]
[cannot apply to paulmck-rcu/dev]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Joel-Fernandes-Google/Implement-call_rcu_lazy-and-miscellaneous-fixes/20220623-065447
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git de5c208d533a46a074eb46ea17f672cc005a7269
config: s390-randconfig-r044-20220622 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220623/202206231028.gVHd7wR5-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 46be5faaf03466c3751f8a2882bef5a217e15926)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/6c59cb940f39b882c20e6858c41df7c1470b930a
git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
git fetch --no-tags linux-review Joel-Fernandes-Google/Implement-call_rcu_lazy-and-miscellaneous-fixes/20220623-065447
git checkout 6c59cb940f39b882c20e6858c41df7c1470b930a
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: kernel/rcu/rcuscale.o: in function `kfree_scale_init':
>> kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:810: undefined reference to `rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush'
>> /opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:813: undefined reference to `rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c:822: undefined reference to `rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: certs/system_keyring.o: in function `load_system_certificate_list':
certs/system_keyring.c:207: undefined reference to `x509_load_certificate_list'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/dma/fsl-edma.o: in function `fsl_edma_probe':
drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c:302: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/dma/fsl-edma.c:327: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/dma/idma64.o: in function `idma64_platform_probe':
drivers/dma/idma64.c:644: undefined reference to `devm_ioremap_resource'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/clocksource/timer-of.o: in function `timer_of_init':
drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:151: undefined reference to `iounmap'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/clocksource/timer-of.o: in function `timer_of_base_init':
drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:159: undefined reference to `of_iomap'
/opt/cross/gcc-11.3.0-nolibc/s390x-linux/bin/s390x-linux-ld: drivers/clocksource/timer-of.o: in function `timer_of_cleanup':
drivers/clocksource/timer-of.c:151: undefined reference to `iounmap'
vim +810 kernel/rcu/rcuscale.c
794
795 static int __init
796 kfree_scale_init(void)
797 {
798 long i;
799 int firsterr = 0;
800 unsigned long orig_jif, jif_start;
801
802 // Force all call_rcu() to call_rcu_lazy() so that non-lazy CBs
803 // do not remove laziness of the lazy ones (since the test tries
804 // to stress call_rcu_lazy() for OOM).
805 //
806 // Also, do a quick self-test to ensure laziness is as much as
807 // expected.
808 if (kfree_rcu_by_lazy) {
809 /* do a test to check the timeout. */
> 810 orig_jif = rcu_scale_get_jiffies_till_flush();
811
812 rcu_force_call_rcu_to_lazy(true);
> 813 rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush(2 * HZ);
814 rcu_barrier();
815
816 jif_start = jiffies;
817 jiffies_at_lazy_cb = 0;
818 call_rcu_lazy(&lazy_test1_rh, call_rcu_lazy_test1);
819
820 smp_cond_load_relaxed(&rcu_lazy_test1_cb_called, VAL == 1);
821
822 rcu_scale_set_jiffies_till_flush(orig_jif);
823
824 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start < 2 * HZ)) {
825 pr_alert("Lazy CBs are not being lazy as expected!\n");
826 return -1;
827 }
828
829 if (WARN_ON_ONCE(jiffies_at_lazy_cb - jif_start > 3 * HZ)) {
830 pr_alert("Lazy CBs are being too lazy!\n");
831 return -1;
832 }
833 }
834
835 kfree_nrealthreads = compute_real(kfree_nthreads);
836 /* Start up the kthreads. */
837 if (shutdown) {
838 init_waitqueue_head(&shutdown_wq);
839 firsterr = torture_create_kthread(kfree_scale_shutdown, NULL,
840 shutdown_task);
841 if (torture_init_error(firsterr))
842 goto unwind;
843 schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
844 }
845
846 pr_alert("kfree object size=%zu, kfree_rcu_by_lazy=%d\n",
847 kfree_mult * sizeof(struct kfree_obj),
848 kfree_rcu_by_lazy);
849
850 kfree_reader_tasks = kcalloc(kfree_nrealthreads, sizeof(kfree_reader_tasks[0]),
851 GFP_KERNEL);
852 if (kfree_reader_tasks == NULL) {
853 firsterr = -ENOMEM;
854 goto unwind;
855 }
856
857 for (i = 0; i < kfree_nrealthreads; i++) {
858 firsterr = torture_create_kthread(kfree_scale_thread, (void *)i,
859 kfree_reader_tasks[i]);
860 if (torture_init_error(firsterr))
861 goto unwind;
862 }
863
864 while (atomic_read(&n_kfree_scale_thread_started) < kfree_nrealthreads)
865 schedule_timeout_uninterruptible(1);
866
867 torture_init_end();
868 return 0;
869
870 unwind:
871 torture_init_end();
872 kfree_scale_cleanup();
873 return firsterr;
874 }
875
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread