From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mga09.intel.com (mga09.intel.com [134.134.136.24]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EF2780F for ; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 13:38:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1660397901; x=1691933901; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=lNxmtn7TP3KZN3UEnL13yw1zfYL3pBdnH/f59m3DyYY=; b=R5WaKmqzXkuWiOENHCiXFG0I0hzmKDXD6HiUVmcMcuVQQpEONxD5sjpJ sPw18RZE+u3dvDTtZOs9XW0d4dRlnOJv7+WHQ64E8dy+2s7kYJ6n0R9bA g29k/qIDM6URKm4nQgKpVPXKfOixhq9oIInHARoncH7H0jXgnfKZrdmyX Q+3XEKaLEhBLrePLVNky/juUOceXayvTJYjnuL1QU80cHi7Rut2Iw8Unp 5MzkPw1gqJPrql3Ma+/EzbFLC7vVfZeE4x0BqKx7Gj3uiO6+LEJG87EX5 AHl29LrjtaCL34yXVCntB9p8dI3ocs72nL5zX9P5EfT8+FnlWzEo4rb9Q w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6400,9594,10437"; a="292548619" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,235,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="292548619" Received: from orsmga007.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.58]) by orsmga102.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 13 Aug 2022 06:38:20 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.93,235,1654585200"; d="scan'208";a="602762016" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO 8745164cafc7) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga007.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 13 Aug 2022 06:38:19 -0700 Received: from kbuild by 8745164cafc7 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1oMrLG-0001iV-2t; Sat, 13 Aug 2022 13:38:18 +0000 Date: Sat, 13 Aug 2022 21:37:47 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jiri Olsa Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [jolsa-perf:bpf/tracing_multi_new_1 22/23] kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3150:20: error: field has incomplete type 'struct ftrace_ops' Message-ID: <202208132147.npPyYMne-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git bpf/tracing_multi_new_1 head: e27bb6c0f6805082ef71568985f74dcefe7ff6ff commit: dc38a65ab46f4ba538353c1eb7c64ac36202eb54 [22/23] fix config: mips-randconfig-r031-20220804 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220813/202208132147.npPyYMne-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 26dd42705c2af0b8f6e5d6cdb32c9bd5ed9524eb) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross # install mips cross compiling tool for clang build # apt-get install binutils-mips-linux-gnu # https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git/commit/?id=dc38a65ab46f4ba538353c1eb7c64ac36202eb54 git remote add jolsa-perf https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git git fetch --no-tags jolsa-perf bpf/tracing_multi_new_1 git checkout dc38a65ab46f4ba538353c1eb7c64ac36202eb54 # save the config file mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=mips SHELL=/bin/bash kernel/bpf/ If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable Reported-by: kernel test robot All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): kernel/bpf/syscall.c:2523:15: error: call to undeclared function 'is_tracing_multi'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] multi_func = is_tracing_multi(attr->expected_attach_type); ^ >> kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3150:20: error: field has incomplete type 'struct ftrace_ops' struct ftrace_ops fops; ^ include/linux/bpf.h:51:8: note: forward declaration of 'struct ftrace_ops' struct ftrace_ops; ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3158:15: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_trampoline_multi_detach'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] WARN_ON_ONCE(bpf_trampoline_multi_detach(&tr_link->fops, &tr_link->tp, tr_link->id)); ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3166:2: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_tramp_id_put'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] bpf_tramp_id_put(tr_link->id); ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3166:2: note: did you mean 'bpf_trampoline_put'? include/linux/bpf.h:1021:20: note: 'bpf_trampoline_put' declared here static inline void bpf_trampoline_put(struct bpf_trampoline *tr) {} ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3329:7: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_tramp_id_alloc'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] id = bpf_tramp_id_alloc(cnt); ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3329:5: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion assigning to 'struct bpf_tramp_id *' from 'int' [-Wint-conversion] id = bpf_tramp_id_alloc(cnt); ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3370:8: error: call to undeclared function 'bpf_trampoline_multi_attach'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] err = bpf_trampoline_multi_attach(&link->fops, &link->tp, id); ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3370:8: note: did you mean 'bpf_tracing_multi_attach'? kernel/bpf/syscall.c:3314:12: note: 'bpf_tracing_multi_attach' declared here static int bpf_tracing_multi_attach(struct bpf_prog *prog, ^ kernel/bpf/syscall.c:4842:12: error: call to undeclared function 'is_tracing_multi'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] else if (is_tracing_multi(prog->expected_attach_type)) ^ 8 errors generated. vim +3150 kernel/bpf/syscall.c 3144 3145 struct bpf_tracing_multi_link { 3146 struct bpf_link link; 3147 enum bpf_attach_type attach_type; 3148 struct bpf_tramp_prog tp; 3149 struct bpf_tramp_id *id; > 3150 struct ftrace_ops fops; 3151 }; 3152 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://01.org/lkp