Re: [PATCH v26 07/10] soc: mediatek: mmsys: add mmsys for support 64 reset bits

Matthias Brugger
2022-08-24T11:41:17Z

On 24/08/2022 04:44, Nancy.Lin wrote:
> Hi Matthias,
>
> Thanks for your comment.
>
> On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 14:08 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>
>> On 23/08/2022 13:30, Nancy.Lin wrote:
>>> Hi Matthias,
>>>
>>> Thanks for the review.
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2022-08-23 at 12:20 +0200, Matthias Brugger wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On 19/08/2022 08:10, Nancy.Lin wrote:
>>>>> Add mmsys for support 64 reset bits. It is a preparation for
>>>>> MT8195
>>>>> vdosys1 HW reset. MT8195 vdosys1 has more than 32 reset bits.
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. Add the number of reset bits in mmsys private data
>>>>> 2. move the whole "reset register code section" behind the
>>>>> "get mmsys->data" code section for getting the num_resets in
>>>>> mmsys-
>>>>>> data.
>>>>>
>>>>> Signed-off-by: Nancy.Lin <nancy.lin@mediatek.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno <
>>>>> angelogioacchino.delregno@collabora.com>
>>>>> Reviewed-by: CK Hu <ck.hu@mediatek.com>
>>>>> Tested-by: Bo-Chen Chen <rex-bc.chen@mediatek.com>
>>>>> ---
>>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c | 40 +++++++++++++++++++++-
>>>>> ---
>>>>> -------
>>>>> drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h | 1 +
>>>>> 2 files changed, 27 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
>>>>>
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
>>>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
>>>>> index 999be064103b..20ae751ad8a7 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c
>>>>> @@ -20,6 +20,8 @@
>>>>> #include "mt8195-mmsys.h"
>>>>> #include "mt8365-mmsys.h"
>>>>>
>>>>> +#define MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG 32
>>>>> +
>>>>> static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
>>>>> mt2701_mmsys_driver_data = {
>>>>> .clk_driver = "clk-mt2701-mm",
>>>>> .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table,
>>>>> @@ -86,6 +88,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
>>>>> mt8173_mmsys_driver_data = {
>>>>> .routes = mmsys_default_routing_table,
>>>>> .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_default_routing_table),
>>>>> .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
>>>>> + .num_resets = 32,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> mt8173_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> = {
>>>>> @@ -100,6 +103,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
>>>>> mt8183_mmsys_driver_data = {
>>>>> .routes = mmsys_mt8183_routing_table,
>>>>> .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8183_routing_table),
>>>>> .sw0_rst_offset = MT8183_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
>>>>> + .num_resets = 32,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> mt8183_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> = {
>>>>> @@ -114,6 +118,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
>>>>> mt8186_mmsys_driver_data = {
>>>>> .routes = mmsys_mt8186_routing_table,
>>>>> .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8186_routing_table),
>>>>> .sw0_rst_offset = MT8186_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
>>>>> + .num_resets = 32,
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> mt8186_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> = {
>>>>> @@ -128,6 +133,7 @@ static const struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data
>>>>> mt8192_mmsys_driver_data = {
>>>>> .routes = mmsys_mt8192_routing_table,
>>>>> .num_routes = ARRAY_SIZE(mmsys_mt8192_routing_table),
>>>>> .sw0_rst_offset = MT8186_MMSYS_SW0_RST_B,
>>>>> + .num_resets = 32,
>>>>
>>>> You didn't reply to Nicolas regarding the reset numbers. I
>>>> actually
>>>> agree with
>>>> him that we will need the num_resets declared for all devices.
>>>> Why do
>>>> you think
>>>> this is not the case?
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Matthias
>>>>
>>>
>>> Sorry, I lost Nicolas's email.
>>>
>>> I checked with the mmsys git log with reset controller function.
>>>
>>> 1. Enric add mmsys reset controller function in [1]/[2].
>>> => in mtk_mmsys_reset_update(), all mmsys reset offset is
>>> MMSYS_SW0_RST_B (0x140).
>>>
>>> 2. After Enric's patch, Rex add sw0_rst_offset in mmsys driver data
>>> in
>>> [3].
>>>
>>> So, I think sw0_rst_offset is not zero. Instead of only add
>>> num_resets
>>> but also need to add sw0_rst_offset for all mmsys. What do you
>>> think ?
>>>
>>
>> Good point. It seems we have a bug in the driver. Either all SoCs
>> have the
>> reset, but it's broken since
>> 62dc30150c06 ("soc: mediatek: mmsys: add sw0_rst_offset in mmsys
>> driver data")
>> or we are adding a reset controller independently if the silicon has
>> one, which
>> would be an error in:
>> f27ef2856343 ("soc: mediatek: mmsys: Add reset controller support")
>>
>> We have to find that out.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Matthias
>
>
> In [2], I think the first revision of Enric's reset controller is added
> for 8173 and 8183, not for all mmsys device.
> =>[v3,4/7] arm64: dts: mt8173: Add the mmsys reset bit to reset the
> dsi0
> =>[v3,5/7] arm64: dts: mt8183: Add the mmsys reset bit to reset the
> dsi0
>
> In [3], Rex only add sw0_rst_offset in 8173 and 8183 mmsys driver data.
>>
>
> For other SoCs, like mt2701,mt2712..., these SoCs even don't define
> mmsys hw reset bit[4]. So I think only set the num_resets to 32 or 64
> to those mmsys devices who really need the reset control, others set to
> 0(same as my v26 patch).
>

Thanks for looking into this, please see my comment further below.

>
> [4]mt2701-resets.h
> https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/tree/include/dt-bindings/reset/mt2701-resets.h?id=62dc30150c06774a8122c52aedd0eddaceaf5940
>
> Regards,
> Nancy
>
>
>>> [1]
>>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c?id=f27ef2856343e2ddc392975d7b15120442e4d7b7__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3cWAYlD1mrWRmNZy0zoJs8MNiD3s7K9PteJI9cGEvu_qp3VShfqxsBTb_fKynszs$
>>>
>>> [2]
>>>
>>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/cover/20210825102632.601614-1-enric.balletbo@collabora.com/__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3cWAYlD1mrWRmNZy0zoJs8MNiD3s7K9PteJI9cGEvu_qp3VShfqxsBTb_cH-3nM8$
>>>
>>> [3]
>>>
>>>
> https://urldefense.com/v3/__https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git/commit/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.c?id=62dc30150c06774a8122c52aedd0eddaceaf5940__;!!CTRNKA9wMg0ARbw!3cWAYlD1mrWRmNZy0zoJs8MNiD3s7K9PteJI9cGEvu_qp3VShfqxsBTb_VXEsbNa$
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Nancy
>>>>
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> static const struct mtk_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> mt8192_mmsys_match_data
>>>>> = {
>>>>> @@ -288,13 +294,19 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_reset_update(struct
>>>>> reset_controller_dev *rcdev, unsigned l
>>>>> {
>>>>> struct mtk_mmsys *mmsys = container_of(rcdev, struct
>>>>> mtk_mmsys,
>>>>> rcdev);
>>>>> unsigned long flags;
>>>>> + u32 offset;
>>>>> + u32 reg;
>>>>> +
>>>>> + offset = (id / MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG) * sizeof(u32);
>>>>> + id = id % MMSYS_SW_RESET_PER_REG;
>>>>> + reg = mmsys->data->sw0_rst_offset + offset;
>>>>>
>>>>> spin_lock_irqsave(&mmsys->lock, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> if (assert)
>>>>> - mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data-
>>>>>> sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), 0, NULL);
>>>>>
>>>>> + mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, reg, BIT(id), 0,
>>>>> NULL);
>>>>> else
>>>>> - mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, mmsys->data-
>>>>>> sw0_rst_offset, BIT(id), BIT(id), NULL);
>>>>>
>>>>> + mtk_mmsys_update_bits(mmsys, reg, BIT(id),
>>>>> BIT(id),
>>>>> NULL);
>>>>>
>>>>> spin_unlock_irqrestore(&mmsys->lock, flags);
>>>>>
>>>>> @@ -351,18 +363,6 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct
>>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> return ret;
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> - spin_lock_init(&mmsys->lock);
>>>>> -
>>>>> - mmsys->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>>> - mmsys->rcdev.nr_resets = 32;
>>>>> - mmsys->rcdev.ops = &mtk_mmsys_reset_ops;
>>>>> - mmsys->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>>> - ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev,
>>>>> &mmsys-
>>>>>> rcdev);
>>>>>
>>>>> - if (ret) {
>>>>> - dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register mmsys
>>>>> reset
>>>>> controller: %d\n", ret);
>>>>> - return ret;
>>>>> - }
>>>>> -
>>>>> res = platform_get_resource(pdev, IORESOURCE_MEM, 0);
>>>>> if (!res) {
>>>>> dev_err(dev, "Couldn't get mmsys resource\n");
>>>>> @@ -384,6 +384,18 @@ static int mtk_mmsys_probe(struct
>>>>> platform_device *pdev)
>>>>> mmsys->data = match_data->drv_data[0];
>>>>> }
>>>>>
>>>>> + spin_lock_init(&mmsys->lock);
>>>>> +
>>>>> + mmsys->rcdev.owner = THIS_MODULE;
>>>>> + mmsys->rcdev.nr_resets = mmsys->data->num_resets;
>>>>> + mmsys->rcdev.ops = &mtk_mmsys_reset_ops;
>>>>> + mmsys->rcdev.of_node = pdev->dev.of_node;
>>>>> + ret = devm_reset_controller_register(&pdev->dev,
>>>>> &mmsys-
>>>>>> rcdev);
>>>>>
>>>>> + if (ret) {
>>>>> + dev_err(&pdev->dev, "Couldn't register mmsys
>>>>> reset
>>>>> controller: %d\n", ret);
>>>>> + return ret;
>>>>> + }
>>>>> +

This code is only relevant if mmsys->data->num_resets > 0. Let's check for that
before setting up and registering an interrupt controller. What do you think?

Regards,
Matthias

>>>>> #if IS_REACHABLE(CONFIG_MTK_CMDQ)
>>>>> ret = cmdq_dev_get_client_reg(dev, &mmsys->cmdq_base,
>>>>> 0);
>>>>> if (ret)
>>>>> diff --git a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> index f01ba206481d..20a271b80b3b 100644
>>>>> --- a/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> +++ b/drivers/soc/mediatek/mtk-mmsys.h
>>>>> @@ -92,6 +92,7 @@ struct mtk_mmsys_driver_data {
>>>>> const struct mtk_mmsys_routes *routes;
>>>>> const unsigned int num_routes;
>>>>> const u16 sw0_rst_offset;
>>>>> + const u32 num_resets;
>>>>> };
>>>>>
>>>>> struct mtk_mmsys_match_data {
>>>>
>>>>
>