public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: John Stultz <jstultz@google.com>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org
Subject: Re: [RFC][PATCH v2 1/2] sched: Avoid placing RT threads on cores handling long softirqs
Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:03:07 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202208241540.4avi4iGS-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822190501.2171100-2-jstultz@google.com>

Hi John,

[FYI, it's a private test report for your RFC patch.]
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v6.0-rc2 next-20220824]
[cannot apply to tip/sched/core]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/John-Stultz/Softirq-rt-Optimizations/20220823-030642
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git 072e51356cd5a4a1c12c1020bc054c99b98333df
config: s390-randconfig-r003-20220824 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220824/202208241540.4avi4iGS-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project d00e97df0fe8c67f694c4d027297f4382ce72b38)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/1d1c0ba7867315d6327259cbf7a561248330038b
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review John-Stultz/Softirq-rt-Optimizations/20220823-030642
        git checkout 1d1c0ba7867315d6327259cbf7a561248330038b
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:34:
   In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:63:
   In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:34:
   In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:63:
   In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:34:
   In file included from kernel/sched/sched.h:63:
   In file included from include/linux/tick.h:8:
   In file included from include/linux/clockchips.h:14:
   In file included from include/linux/clocksource.h:22:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:45:
>> kernel/sched/rt.c:1612:33: error: no member named '__softirq_pending' in 'struct irq_stat'
                          per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).__softirq_pending;
                          ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   12 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +1612 kernel/sched/rt.c

  1601	
  1602	#ifdef CONFIG_RT_SOFTIRQ_OPTIMIZATION
  1603	/*
  1604	 * Return whether the task on the given cpu is currently non-preemptible
  1605	 * while handling a potentially long softirq, or if the task is likely
  1606	 * to block preemptions soon because it is a ksoftirq thread that is
  1607	 * handling slow softirq.
  1608	 */
  1609	static bool task_may_preempt(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
  1610	{
  1611		u32 softirqs = per_cpu(active_softirqs, cpu) |
> 1612			       per_cpu(irq_stat, cpu).__softirq_pending;
  1613	
  1614		struct task_struct *cpu_ksoftirqd = per_cpu(ksoftirqd, cpu);
  1615		struct task_struct *curr;
  1616		struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu);
  1617		int ret;
  1618	
  1619		rcu_read_lock();
  1620		curr = READ_ONCE(rq->curr); /* unlocked access */
  1621		ret = !((softirqs & LONG_SOFTIRQ_MASK) &&
  1622			 (curr == cpu_ksoftirqd ||
  1623			  preempt_count() & SOFTIRQ_MASK));
  1624		rcu_read_unlock();
  1625		return ret;
  1626	}
  1627	#else
  1628	static bool task_may_preempt(struct task_struct *task, int cpu)
  1629	{
  1630		return true;
  1631	}
  1632	#endif /* CONFIG_RT_SOFTIRQ_OPTIMIZATION */
  1633	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

           reply	other threads:[~2022-08-24  8:04 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20220822190501.2171100-2-jstultz@google.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202208241540.4avi4iGS-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=jstultz@google.com \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox