public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
	Andy Lutomirski <luto@amacapital.net>,
	Will Drewry <wad@chromium.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, kbuild-all@lists.01.org,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Kuniyuki Iwashima <kuniyu@amazon.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com,
	Ayushman Dutta <ayudutta@amazon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] seccomp: Release filter when copy_process() fails.
Date: Fri, 2 Sep 2022 11:16:05 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202209021045.YbjuMbic-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20220822204436.26631-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>

Hi Kuniyuki,

Thank you for the patch! Yet something to improve:

[auto build test ERROR on kees/for-next/pstore]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.0-rc3]
[cannot apply to kees/for-next/seccomp next-20220901]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]

url:    https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Kuniyuki-Iwashima/seccomp-Release-filter-when-copy_process-fails/20220823-044710
base:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/kees/linux.git for-next/pstore
config: s390-buildonly-randconfig-r006-20220901 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20220902/202209021045.YbjuMbic-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project c55b41d5199d2394dd6cdb8f52180d8b81d809d4)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
        wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
        chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
        # install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
        # apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
        # https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commit/ea0fdd2f2e9a09bd5428bd59e81bac66e949f578
        git remote add linux-review https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux
        git fetch --no-tags linux-review Kuniyuki-Iwashima/seccomp-Release-filter-when-copy_process-fails/20220823-044710
        git checkout ea0fdd2f2e9a09bd5428bd59e81bac66e949f578
        # save the config file
        mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
        COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash

If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

   In file included from kernel/fork.c:79:
   In file included from include/linux/tty.h:12:
   In file included from include/linux/tty_port.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/kfifo.h:42:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:464:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                             ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:477:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
   #define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
   #define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/fork.c:79:
   In file included from include/linux/tty.h:12:
   In file included from include/linux/tty_port.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/kfifo.h:42:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:490:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
                                                           ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
   #define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
                                                             ^
   include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
   #define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
                                                        ^
   In file included from kernel/fork.c:79:
   In file included from include/linux/tty.h:12:
   In file included from include/linux/tty_port.h:5:
   In file included from include/linux/kfifo.h:42:
   In file included from include/linux/scatterlist.h:9:
   In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
   include/asm-generic/io.h:501:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                               ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:511:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:521:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
                                                         ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:609:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:617:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:625:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                  ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:634:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:643:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/io.h:652:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
           writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
                   ~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> kernel/fork.c:540:28: error: no member named 'filter' in 'struct seccomp'
           WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->seccomp.filter);
                        ~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^
   include/asm-generic/bug.h:104:25: note: expanded from macro 'WARN_ON_ONCE'
           int __ret_warn_on = !!(condition);                      \
                                  ^~~~~~~~~
   kernel/fork.c:854:20: warning: no previous prototype for function 'arch_task_cache_init' [-Wmissing-prototypes]
   void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
                      ^
   kernel/fork.c:854:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit
   void __init __weak arch_task_cache_init(void) { }
   ^
   static 
   13 warnings and 1 error generated.


vim +540 kernel/fork.c

   537	
   538	void free_task(struct task_struct *tsk)
   539	{
 > 540		WARN_ON_ONCE(tsk->seccomp.filter);
   541		release_user_cpus_ptr(tsk);
   542		scs_release(tsk);
   543	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://01.org/lkp

           reply	other threads:[~2022-09-02  3:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed
 [parent not found: <20220822204436.26631-1-kuniyu@amazon.com>]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202209021045.YbjuMbic-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=ayudutta@amazon.com \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=kbuild-all@lists.01.org \
    --cc=keescook@chromium.org \
    --cc=kuniyu@amazon.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=luto@amacapital.net \
    --cc=syzbot+ab17848fe269b573eb71@syzkaller.appspotmail.com \
    --cc=wad@chromium.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox