From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>,
Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>,
Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scripts: handle BrokenPipeError for python scripts
Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2023 14:06:49 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202301121403.599806C597@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230112023006.1873859-1-masahiroy@kernel.org>
On Thu, Jan 12, 2023 at 11:30:06AM +0900, Masahiro Yamada wrote:
> def main():
> try:
> # simulate large output (your code replaces this loop)
> for x in range(10000):
> print("y")
> # flush output here to force SIGPIPE to be triggered
> # while inside this try block.
> sys.stdout.flush()
> except BrokenPipeError:
> # Python flushes standard streams on exit; redirect remaining output
> # to devnull to avoid another BrokenPipeError at shutdown
> devnull = os.open(os.devnull, os.O_WRONLY)
> os.dup2(devnull, sys.stdout.fileno())
> sys.exit(1) # Python exits with error code 1 on EPIPE
I still think this is wrong -- they should not continue piping, and
should just die with SIGPIPE. It should simply be:
signal(SIGPIPE, SIG_DFL);
Nothing else needed. No wasted CPU cycles, shell handling continues as
per normal.
> if __name__ == '__main__':
> main()
>
> Do not set SIGPIPE’s disposition to SIG_DFL in order to avoid
> BrokenPipeError. Doing that would cause your program to exit
> unexpectedly whenever any socket connection is interrupted while
> your program is still writing to it.
This advise is for socket programs, not command-line tools.
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-01-12 22:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-01-12 2:30 [PATCH] scripts: handle BrokenPipeError for python scripts Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-12 18:55 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-01-12 21:14 ` Nicolas Schier
2023-01-12 22:06 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-01-15 3:04 ` Masahiro Yamada
2023-01-22 17:59 ` Masahiro Yamada
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202301121403.599806C597@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=masahiroy@kernel.org \
--cc=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=trix@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox