Re: LTP: list of failures on 32bit and compat mode

[Petr Vorel <pvorel@suse.cz>]

> On Thu, Apr 6, 2023, at 14:48, Petr Vorel wrote:
> >> On Thu, Apr 6, 2023, at 12:56, Petr Vorel wrote:

> >> Ah, I see. This must be the padding code then, not the time64
> >> conversion:

> >> +int recvmmsg(int fd, struct mmsghdr *msgvec, unsigned int vlen, unsigned int flags, struct timespec *timeout)
> >> +{
> >> +#if LONG_MAX > INT_MAX
> >> +       struct mmsghdr *mh = msgvec;
> >> +       unsigned int i;
> >> +       for (i = vlen; i; i--, mh++)
> >> +               mh->msg_hdr.__pad1 = mh->msg_hdr.__pad2 = 0;
> >> +#endif

> > I suppose this is a suggestion for fix in LTP. I'd expect is should go into
> > testcases/kernel/syscalls/sendmmsg/sendmmsg_var.h into static inline int
> > sys_recvmmsg(...)

> > But that at least on glibc 64bit compilation does not see __pad1 member:

> > ../sendmmsg/sendmmsg_var.h: In function ‘sys_recvmmsg’:
> > ../sendmmsg/sendmmsg_var.h:47:28: error: ‘struct msghdr’ has no member 
> > named ‘__pad1’
> >    47 |                 mh->msg_hdr.__pad1 = mh->msg_hdr.__pad2 = 0;
> >       |                            ^

> Sorry, I should have been clearer, the snippet I cited is
> from the musl sources, and the __pad access is what causes the
> segfault. The fix is to catch the fault on ltp, same as for the
> time64 conversions.

Thanks! I've just searched in musl as well, because it didn't make sense to me
it'd be a code for LTP.

"to catch the fault on ltp" I wonder if it's not actually musl bug.

Kind regards,
Petr


>       Arnd