From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: "Mike Rapoport (IBM)" <rppt@kernel.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
Mike Rapoport <rppt@kernel.org>
Subject: [rppt:jitalloc/v0.1 12/15] arch/s390/mm/init.c:325:48: error: call to undeclared function 'get_module_load_offset'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sat, 3 Jun 2023 02:47:00 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306030202.7z8cyTCe-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git jitalloc/v0.1
head: ee9292c97c0c221b03b6a12402596b1829dd2bd0
commit: 400757f3295e882e8a562583b8b8ee77e696c47c [12/15] arch: make jitalloc setup available regardless of CONFIG_MODULES
config: s390-randconfig-r014-20230531 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230603/202306030202.7z8cyTCe-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 4faf3aaf28226a4e950c103a14f6fc1d1fdabb1b)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build):
mkdir -p ~/bin
wget https://raw.githubusercontent.com/intel/lkp-tests/master/sbin/make.cross -O ~/bin/make.cross
chmod +x ~/bin/make.cross
# install s390 cross compiling tool for clang build
# apt-get install binutils-s390x-linux-gnu
# https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git/commit/?id=400757f3295e882e8a562583b8b8ee77e696c47c
git remote add rppt https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rppt/linux.git
git fetch --no-tags rppt jitalloc/v0.1
git checkout 400757f3295e882e8a562583b8b8ee77e696c47c
# save the config file
mkdir build_dir && cp config build_dir/.config
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 olddefconfig
COMPILER_INSTALL_PATH=$HOME/0day COMPILER=clang ~/bin/make.cross W=1 O=build_dir ARCH=s390 SHELL=/bin/bash arch/s390/mm/
If you fix the issue, kindly add following tag where applicable
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306030202.7z8cyTCe-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
In file included from arch/s390/mm/init.c:25:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:37:59: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu'
#define __le16_to_cpu(x) __swab16((__force __u16)(__le16)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:102:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab16'
#define __swab16(x) (__u16)__builtin_bswap16((__u16)(x))
^
In file included from arch/s390/mm/init.c:25:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr));
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/uapi/linux/byteorder/big_endian.h:35:59: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu'
#define __le32_to_cpu(x) __swab32((__force __u32)(__le32)(x))
^
include/uapi/linux/swab.h:115:54: note: expanded from macro '__swab32'
#define __swab32(x) (__u32)__builtin_bswap32((__u32)(x))
^
In file included from arch/s390/mm/init.c:25:
In file included from include/linux/memblock.h:13:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/dma.h:5:
In file included from arch/s390/include/asm/io.h:75:
include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
__raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic]
writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count);
~~~~~~~~~~ ^
>> arch/s390/mm/init.c:325:48: error: call to undeclared function 'get_module_load_offset'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
jit_alloc_params.text.start = MODULES_VADDR + get_module_load_offset();
^
12 warnings and 1 error generated.
vim +/get_module_load_offset +325 arch/s390/mm/init.c
322
323 struct jit_alloc_params *jit_alloc_arch_params(void)
324 {
> 325 jit_alloc_params.text.start = MODULES_VADDR + get_module_load_offset();
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-06-02 18:47 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202306030202.7z8cyTCe-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=rppt@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox