public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res)
@ 2023-06-24 21:12 kernel test robot
  2023-06-26  8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-06-24 21:12 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Lobakin
  Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-kernel, Yury Norov, Andy Shevchenko

Hi Alexander,

FYI, the error/warning still remains.

tree:   https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux.git master
head:   a92b7d26c743b9dc06d520f863d624e94978a1d9
commit: dc34d5036692c614eef23c1130ee42a201c316bf lib: test_bitmap: add compile-time optimization/evaluations assertions
date:   12 months ago
config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-r003-20230624 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230625/202306250533.CBxzOSEh-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a)
reproduce: (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230625/202306250533.CBxzOSEh-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202306250533.CBxzOSEh-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res)
           BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(res));
           ^
   include/linux/build_bug.h:50:2: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON'
           BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(condition, "BUILD_BUG_ON failed: " #condition)
           ^
   include/linux/build_bug.h:39:37: note: expanded from macro 'BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG'
   #define BUILD_BUG_ON_MSG(cond, msg) compiletime_assert(!(cond), msg)
                                       ^
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:352:2: note: expanded from macro 'compiletime_assert'
           _compiletime_assert(condition, msg, __compiletime_assert_, __COUNTER__)
           ^
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:340:2: note: expanded from macro '_compiletime_assert'
           __compiletime_assert(condition, msg, prefix, suffix)
           ^
   include/linux/compiler_types.h:333:4: note: expanded from macro '__compiletime_assert'
                           prefix ## suffix();                             \
                           ^
   <scratch space>:295:1: note: expanded from here
   __compiletime_assert_372
   ^
   1 error generated.


vim +/error +920 lib/test_bitmap.c

   871	
   872	static void __init test_bitmap_const_eval(void)
   873	{
   874		DECLARE_BITMAP(bitmap, BITS_PER_LONG);
   875		unsigned long initvar = BIT(2);
   876		unsigned long bitopvar = 0;
   877		unsigned long var = 0;
   878		int res;
   879	
   880		/*
   881		 * Compilers must be able to optimize all of those to compile-time
   882		 * constants on any supported optimization level (-O2, -Os) and any
   883		 * architecture. Otherwise, trigger a build bug.
   884		 * The whole function gets optimized out then, there's nothing to do
   885		 * in runtime.
   886		 */
   887	
   888		/*
   889		 * Equals to `unsigned long bitmap[1] = { GENMASK(6, 5), }`.
   890		 * Clang on s390 optimizes bitops at compile-time as intended, but at
   891		 * the same time stops treating @bitmap and @bitopvar as compile-time
   892		 * constants after regular test_bit() is executed, thus triggering the
   893		 * build bugs below. So, call const_test_bit() there directly until
   894		 * the compiler is fixed.
   895		 */
   896		bitmap_clear(bitmap, 0, BITS_PER_LONG);
   897	#if defined(__s390__) && defined(__clang__)
   898		if (!const_test_bit(7, bitmap))
   899	#else
   900		if (!test_bit(7, bitmap))
   901	#endif
   902			bitmap_set(bitmap, 5, 2);
   903	
   904		/* Equals to `unsigned long bitopvar = BIT(20)` */
   905		__change_bit(31, &bitopvar);
   906		bitmap_shift_right(&bitopvar, &bitopvar, 11, BITS_PER_LONG);
   907	
   908		/* Equals to `unsigned long var = BIT(25)` */
   909		var |= BIT(25);
   910		if (var & BIT(0))
   911			var ^= GENMASK(9, 6);
   912	
   913		/* __const_hweight<32|64>(GENMASK(6, 5)) == 2 */
   914		res = bitmap_weight(bitmap, 20);
   915		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(res));
   916		BUILD_BUG_ON(res != 2);
   917	
   918		/* !(BIT(31) & BIT(18)) == 1 */
   919		res = !test_bit(18, &bitopvar);
 > 920		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(res));
   921		BUILD_BUG_ON(!res);
   922	
   923		/* BIT(2) & GENMASK(14, 8) == 0 */
   924		res = initvar & GENMASK(14, 8);
   925		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(res));
   926		BUILD_BUG_ON(res);
   927	
   928		/* ~BIT(25) */
   929		BUILD_BUG_ON(!__builtin_constant_p(~var));
   930		BUILD_BUG_ON(~var != ~BIT(25));
   931	}
   932	

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res)
  2023-06-24 21:12 lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res) kernel test robot
@ 2023-06-26  8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
  2023-06-26 11:57   ` Alexander Lobakin
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-06-26  8:32 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kernel test robot
  Cc: Alexander Lobakin, llvm, oe-kbuild-all, linux-kernel, Yury Norov

On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:12:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> Hi Alexander,
> 
> FYI, the error/warning still remains.

Alexander, do you have anything to present to fix this? Or is your plan to send
something after v6.5-rc1?

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res)
  2023-06-26  8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
@ 2023-06-26 11:57   ` Alexander Lobakin
  2023-06-26 13:26     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Alexander Lobakin @ 2023-06-26 11:57 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Andy Shevchenko
  Cc: Nick Desaulniers, kernel test robot, llvm, oe-kbuild-all,
	linux-kernel, Yury Norov

From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:32:51 +0300

> On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:12:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>> Hi Alexander,
>>
>> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> 
> Alexander, do you have anything to present to fix this? Or is your plan to send
> something after v6.5-rc1?

Hi,
I was waiting for an email from Nick (or some further update of the
GitHub issue page) to clarify whether the compiler should be fixed or I
should work around this in the code. If the latter, I could send a fix
this week, so that it could even hit the bitmap pull request.

Thanks,
Olek

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res)
  2023-06-26 11:57   ` Alexander Lobakin
@ 2023-06-26 13:26     ` Andy Shevchenko
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Andy Shevchenko @ 2023-06-26 13:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Alexander Lobakin
  Cc: Nick Desaulniers, kernel test robot, llvm, oe-kbuild-all,
	linux-kernel, Yury Norov

On Mon, Jun 26, 2023 at 01:57:46PM +0200, Alexander Lobakin wrote:
> From: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
> Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2023 11:32:51 +0300
> > On Sun, Jun 25, 2023 at 05:12:36AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
> >> Hi Alexander,
> >>
> >> FYI, the error/warning still remains.
> > 
> > Alexander, do you have anything to present to fix this? Or is your plan to send
> > something after v6.5-rc1?
> 
> I was waiting for an email from Nick (or some further update of the
> GitHub issue page) to clarify whether the compiler should be fixed or I
> should work around this in the code.

Okay, got it! Maybe you can ping him?

> If the latter, I could send a fix
> this week, so that it could even hit the bitmap pull request.

It could hit a PR after v6.5-rc1 (Linus expects the following: a) the PR
to be send in the _first_ week of merge window with rare exceptions, and
b) the commits in PR has to be sit in Linux Next for a while, usually
a couple of weeks).

-- 
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2023-06-26 13:26 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2023-06-24 21:12 lib/test_bitmap.c:920:2: error: call to __compiletime_assert_372 declared with 'error' attribute: BUILD_BUG_ON failed: !__builtin_constant_p(res) kernel test robot
2023-06-26  8:32 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-06-26 11:57   ` Alexander Lobakin
2023-06-26 13:26     ` Andy Shevchenko

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox