From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
linux-usb@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: UBSAN spat in valid xhci code in Linus's current tree (6.4+)
Date: Thu, 29 Jun 2023 11:58:43 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202306291147.4CE126CE5@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2023062945-fencing-pebble-0411@gregkh>
On Thu, Jun 29, 2023 at 05:36:51PM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> Boris just reported to me a UBSAN splat in the USB xhci driver in
> Linus's tree that wasn't present in 6.4-final, and given that no USB
> changes are merged yet there, I was confused.
>
> Turns out, I think you all missed a "variable length" structure in the
> xhci driver, which UBSAN is calling out a being an overrun, when really
> it isn't (it's just written that way...)
>
> The splat is:
>
> UBSAN: array-index-out-of-bounds in drivers/usb/host/xhci-hub.c:231:31
> index 1 is out of range for type '__le32 [1]'
> CPU: 0 PID: 1556 Comm: kworker/0:2 Not tainted 6.4.0+ #7
This is fixed here, a couple weeks ago, but maybe it missed your tree:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20230614181307.gonna.256-kees@kernel.org/
Would you prefer I carry it?
> So perhaps 2d47c6956ab3 ("ubsan: Tighten UBSAN_BOUNDS on GCC") should be
> reverted for now? Or this field fixed up to properly be marked as a
> variable length array of at least one entry?
We've been turning these things on further and further so we can catch
stuff like this (and we did while it lived in -next). FWIW, it shouldn't
cause any problems beyond the splat (i.e. everything should continue
working normally).
-Kees
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-06-29 18:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-06-29 15:36 UBSAN spat in valid xhci code in Linus's current tree (6.4+) Greg KH
2023-06-29 18:58 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-06-29 19:18 ` Greg KH
2023-06-29 19:00 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202306291147.4CE126CE5@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kbuild@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-usb@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox