From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-yb1-f202.google.com (mail-yb1-f202.google.com [209.85.219.202]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E82153FF4 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 22:51:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail-yb1-f202.google.com with SMTP id 3f1490d57ef6-d11f35a0d5cso1373947276.1 for ; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:51:02 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20221208; t=1690498261; x=1691103061; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:from:to:cc:subject :date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9gBFfLJA2QnUt2o02yj0CBzRwwnMTjBwRjYaFoYtp30=; b=tRjo0W7c5gh+Dl3UY4mPCGq5xDIupvaIqcoLAO+9A9kMjC1WtyedfU6hNp4MSytOPv +tlpG0WLRrdfIwlylaKATwQVYjuLN6/5nw+atV3kXwCugkKtuurz4KvMOG+WiX99AZKE JpuagiL99epKN2RpBFrz2XNkolkmASb84Mm39epg2pYFJ+aTGHvDFAR454touPNQrlxv 9PbUxILqC2VhCabFZuQA18iK20AVBdQIa0RykF6333oDvdoV2lUpoOUj7jbw0gwqtJ8B wccBZPAUPOHacmQ/pxoXlIGHNrW8HHMFWFHNOmkhzaIoPSyUgArPtv1HenJDOYcgiMC9 I6Yw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20221208; t=1690498261; x=1691103061; h=cc:to:from:subject:message-id:mime-version:date:x-gm-message-state :from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=9gBFfLJA2QnUt2o02yj0CBzRwwnMTjBwRjYaFoYtp30=; b=OpTkpMkKGc3Oby9QIh0yo1fNLE+p9YQzsurIsO7ktSLsBz/UaIT93dTmO/kTtZCWyN M9guem/x2nz9xE/DT9Knvtbfl+fIYFG+zfe//tceY/YgVZjW3iclZYfm1Qz61h4xXP3y M7YiFbBsLUApcCSTKrgY0tTzCfvP+jOvhYx2cb2lOXniFxsvsJIUZHbukZap89m3S3/4 4m3TnqItev5BENem9sk90NIx2gg4seDv5hofB8VT8B7Gve1cFxUcN6HGBt+ei7os2gb6 PbSCrMtPzbLAMEOhL/rsf9OW4jSlTj0Ti5WFjB+9daHT+3LnobZt3AZNsZiK8rAlFYp2 nhJA== X-Gm-Message-State: ABy/qLaZMjzBoiuwnYMho4M9jr2R6lpglN9oTjUEvxJr9kMTP6YE85Qj yHgH3w6fFSMoi+1mxNlArT5nzwj1d/UOI15qq4Y= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APBJJlHs1u1Z2TVx58in2bo8paryCsP0hXDuuvI0B3YUjX8FowCyzCFy0y9JpwKV4OLjAO/T78ne7OXi3rwgeHRzdVE= X-Received: from ndesaulniers-desktop.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2d1:203:659f:4728:cfbb:8cc3]) (user=ndesaulniers job=sendgmr) by 2002:a25:d2c9:0:b0:d05:7ba4:67f9 with SMTP id j192-20020a25d2c9000000b00d057ba467f9mr144ybg.3.1690498261119; Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:51:01 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 27 Jul 2023 15:50:58 -0700 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 X-B4-Tracking: v=1; b=H4sIANH0wmQC/2WNyw6DIBQFf8XcdWl4hCJd+R+NC8RbIFEwUE0b4 7+Xuu1yJidzdiiYAxa4Nztk3EIJKVbglwasN9EhCWNl4JQLqrgiZh7dshItLEUpKNeSQR0PpiA ZsonW13lcp6nKJeMzvM/6o6/sQ3ml/DnPNvazf92NEUaMljdNUUnRtp1LyU14tWmG/jiOL3UgT tOyAAAA X-Developer-Key: i=ndesaulniers@google.com; a=ed25519; pk=UIrHvErwpgNbhCkRZAYSX0CFd/XFEwqX3D0xqtqjNug= X-Developer-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; t=1690498259; l=3950; i=ndesaulniers@google.com; s=20220923; h=from:subject:message-id; bh=HmXOPSMRuaQICNAuT3z+gT3+4lGoIiU2zn92zax0abE=; b=C/jkLISLEg3RiEbGKI3rgPrsu0tsBb8GyyA/jdmvz1BRew0Z+NUTi11CP6+Z2T96EFYYXYUQh jtpaWUls+1bBQK1bfjI0vJFqRDFd85XQSGhQzFzs1b9y8kZQH7Qiop7 X-Mailer: b4 0.12.2 Message-ID: <20230727-amdgpu-v2-1-7fc66bc52bf6@google.com> Subject: [PATCH v2] drm: fix indirect goto into statement expression UB From: ndesaulniers@google.com To: Maarten Lankhorst , Maxime Ripard , Thomas Zimmermann , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Nathan Chancellor , Tom Rix Cc: dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, llvm@lists.linux.dev, Naresh Kamboju , Nick Desaulniers Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" A new diagnostic in clang-17 now produces the following build error: drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:41:3: error: cannot jump from this indirect goto statement to one of its possible targets 41 | drm_exec_retry_on_contention(&exec); | ^ include/drm/drm_exec.h:96:4: note: expanded from macro 'drm_exec_retry_on_contention' 96 | goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; | ^ drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: possible target of indirect goto statement 39 | drm_exec_until_all_locked(&exec) { | ^ include/drm/drm_exec.h:79:33: note: expanded from macro 'drm_exec_until_all_locked' 79 | __label__ __drm_exec_retry; drivers/gpu/drm/tests/drm_exec_test.c:39:2: note: jump enters a statement expression The GCC manually currently states that: >> Jumping into a statement expression with a computed goto (see Labels >> as Values) has undefined behavior. So the diagnostic appears correct, even if codegen happened to produce working code. Looking closer at this code, while the original combination of statement expression, local label, and computed/indirect goto GNU C expressions were clever, a simple while loop and continue block might have sufficed. This approach might not work as expected if drm_exec_until_all_locked "loops" can be nested, but that doesn't appear to be an existing use case in the codebase. Fixes: commit 09593216bff1 ("drm: execution context for GEM buffers v7") Link: https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Statement-Exprs.html Link: https://github.com/ClangBuiltLinux/linux/issues/1890 Link: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/20219106060208f0c2f5d096eb3aed7b712f5067 Reported-by: Nathan Chancellor Reported-by: Naresh Kamboju Signed-off-by: Nick Desaulniers --- Changes in v2: Fix the continue to be outside of the do while - Link to v1: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20230727-amdgpu-v1-1-a95690e75388@google.com --- include/drm/drm_exec.h | 21 +++++---------------- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 16 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/drm/drm_exec.h b/include/drm/drm_exec.h index 73205afec162..fa1cc5c3d021 100644 --- a/include/drm/drm_exec.h +++ b/include/drm/drm_exec.h @@ -70,18 +70,8 @@ struct drm_exec { * Core functionality of the drm_exec object. Loops until all GEM objects are * locked and no more contention exists. At the beginning of the loop it is * guaranteed that no GEM object is locked. - * - * Since labels can't be defined local to the loops body we use a jump pointer - * to make sure that the retry is only used from within the loops body. */ -#define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) \ - for (void *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; ({ \ - __label__ __drm_exec_retry; \ -__drm_exec_retry: \ - __drm_exec_retry_ptr = &&__drm_exec_retry; \ - (void)__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \ - drm_exec_cleanup(exec); \ - });) +#define drm_exec_until_all_locked(exec) while(drm_exec_cleanup(exec)) /** * drm_exec_retry_on_contention - restart the loop to grap all locks @@ -90,11 +80,10 @@ __drm_exec_retry: \ * Control flow helper to continue when a contention was detected and we need to * clean up and re-start the loop to prepare all GEM objects. */ -#define drm_exec_retry_on_contention(exec) \ - do { \ - if (unlikely(drm_exec_is_contended(exec))) \ - goto *__drm_exec_retry_ptr; \ - } while (0) +#define drm_exec_retry_on_contention(exec) \ + if (unlikely(drm_exec_is_contended(exec))) \ + continue; \ + do {} while (0) /** * drm_exec_is_contended - check for contention --- base-commit: 451cc82bd11eb6a374f4dbcfc1cf007eafea91ab change-id: 20230727-amdgpu-93c0e5302951 Best regards, -- Nick Desaulniers