public inbox for llvm@lists.linux.dev
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: ndesaulniers@google.com, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>,
	Tom Rix <trix@redhat.com>,
	linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] word-at-a-time: use the same return type for has_zero regardless of endianness
Date: Wed, 2 Aug 2023 09:15:53 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230802161553.GA2108867@dev-arch.thelio-3990X> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHk-=wgkC80Ey0Wyi3zHYexUmteeDL3hvZrp=EpMrDccRGmMwA@mail.gmail.com>

On Tue, Aug 01, 2023 at 06:07:08PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> I think the patch is fine, but I guess I'd like to know that people
> who are affected actually don't see any code generation changes (or
> possibly see improvements from not turning it into a bool until later)

We see this warning with ARCH=arm64 defconfig + CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN=y.
With both clang 18.0.0 (tip of tree) and GCC 13.1.0, I don't see any
actual code generation changes in fs/namei.o with this configuration.
I'd be pretty surprised if any of the other uses of has_zero() show any
changes, I at least checked lib/string.o with that configuration and
s390 and did not see anything.

As far as I can tell, arm and arm64 with CONFIG_CPU_BIG_ENDIAN=y are the
only configurations that can hit the particular bit of code with the
generic big endian has_zero() implementation because the version of
hash_name() that uses has_zero() in this manner is only used when
CONFIG_DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS is set, which only arm, arm64, powerpc (little
endian), and x86 select.

arch/arm/Kconfig:49:         select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS if HAVE_EFFICIENT_UNALIGNED_ACCESS
arch/arm64/Kconfig:121:        select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS
arch/powerpc/Kconfig:183:        select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS                if PPC64 && CPU_LITTLE_ENDIAN
arch/x86/Kconfig:140:        select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS                if !KMSAN
arch/x86/um/Kconfig:12:         select DCACHE_WORD_ACCESS

So seems like a pretty low risk patch to me but I could be missing
something.

Cheers,
Nathan

  parent reply	other threads:[~2023-08-02 16:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-08-01 22:22 [PATCH] word-at-a-time: use the same return type for has_zero regardless of endianness ndesaulniers
2023-08-01 22:45 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-08-02  1:07 ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-02  5:59   ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-02  7:50     ` Heiko Carstens
2023-08-02 16:15   ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
2023-08-02 17:37     ` Linus Torvalds
2023-08-02 18:17       ` Arnd Bergmann
2023-08-04 13:04         ` Will Deacon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230802161553.GA2108867@dev-arch.thelio-3990X \
    --to=nathan@kernel.org \
    --cc=arnd@arndb.de \
    --cc=linux-arch@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=trix@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox