From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [rt-devel:linux-6.5.y-rt-rebase 21/89] kernel/softirq.c:658:40: error: call to undeclared function 'local_pending_timers'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations
Date: Sat, 9 Sep 2023 10:59:12 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309091041.Dj6oDUu8-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rt/linux-rt-devel.git linux-6.5.y-rt-rebase
head: c6fcf37a5a805382cef13fc285bbbc18b2bf7180
commit: a48154df8446e20778f71023444fb15deeddf607 [21/89] softirq: Use a dedicated thread for timer wakeups.
config: i386-randconfig-005-20230909 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309091041.Dj6oDUu8-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20230909/202309091041.Dj6oDUu8-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202309091041.Dj6oDUu8-lkp@intel.com/
Note: the rt-devel/linux-6.5.y-rt-rebase HEAD c6fcf37a5a805382cef13fc285bbbc18b2bf7180 builds fine.
It only hurts bisectability.
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> kernel/softirq.c:658:40: error: call to undeclared function 'local_pending_timers'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && local_pending_timers())
^
1 error generated.
vim +/local_pending_timers +658 kernel/softirq.c
644
645 static inline void __irq_exit_rcu(void)
646 {
647 #ifndef __ARCH_IRQ_EXIT_IRQS_DISABLED
648 local_irq_disable();
649 #else
650 lockdep_assert_irqs_disabled();
651 #endif
652 account_hardirq_exit(current);
653 preempt_count_sub(HARDIRQ_OFFSET);
654 if (!in_interrupt()) {
655 if (local_softirq_pending())
656 invoke_softirq();
657
> 658 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_PREEMPT_RT) && local_pending_timers())
659 wake_timersd();
660 }
661
662 tick_irq_exit();
663 }
664
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2023-09-09 2:59 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309091041.Dj6oDUu8-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox