* Re: [PATCH v7 09/13] x86: Secure Launch SMP bringup support
[not found] <20231110222751.219836-10-ross.philipson@oracle.com>
@ 2023-11-11 10:41 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-11-11 10:41 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Ross Philipson, linux-kernel, x86, linux-integrity, linux-doc,
linux-crypto, iommu, kexec, linux-efi
Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, ross.philipson, dpsmith, tglx, mingo, bp,
hpa, ardb, mjg59, James.Bottomley, luto, nivedita, kanth.ghatraju,
trenchboot-devel
Hi Ross,
kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings:
[auto build test WARNING on tip/x86/core]
[also build test WARNING on herbert-cryptodev-2.6/master herbert-crypto-2.6/master linus/master v6.6 next-20231110]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Ross-Philipson/x86-boot-Place-kernel_info-at-a-fixed-offset/20231111-063453
base: tip/x86/core
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231110222751.219836-10-ross.philipson%40oracle.com
patch subject: [PATCH v7 09/13] x86: Secure Launch SMP bringup support
config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311111806.sbmcWUN1-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231111/202311111806.sbmcWUN1-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311111806.sbmcWUN1-lkp@intel.com/
All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:1097:6: warning: variable 'ret' is used uninitialized whenever 'if' condition is true [-Wsometimes-uninitialized]
if (slaunch_is_txt_launch())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:1107:6: note: uninitialized use occurs here
if (ret)
^~~
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:1097:2: note: remove the 'if' if its condition is always false
if (slaunch_is_txt_launch())
^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c:1046:9: note: initialize the variable 'ret' to silence this warning
int ret;
^
= 0
1 warning generated.
vim +1097 arch/x86/kernel/smpboot.c
1036
1037 /*
1038 * NOTE - on most systems this is a PHYSICAL apic ID, but on multiquad
1039 * (ie clustered apic addressing mode), this is a LOGICAL apic ID.
1040 * Returns zero if startup was successfully sent, else error code from
1041 * ->wakeup_secondary_cpu.
1042 */
1043 static int do_boot_cpu(u32 apicid, int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
1044 {
1045 unsigned long start_ip = real_mode_header->trampoline_start;
1046 int ret;
1047
1048 #ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
1049 /* If 64-bit wakeup method exists, use the 64-bit mode trampoline IP */
1050 if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64)
1051 start_ip = real_mode_header->trampoline_start64;
1052 #endif
1053 idle->thread.sp = (unsigned long)task_pt_regs(idle);
1054 initial_code = (unsigned long)start_secondary;
1055
1056 if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_X86_32)) {
1057 early_gdt_descr.address = (unsigned long)get_cpu_gdt_rw(cpu);
1058 initial_stack = idle->thread.sp;
1059 } else if (!(smpboot_control & STARTUP_PARALLEL_MASK)) {
1060 smpboot_control = cpu;
1061 }
1062
1063 /* Enable the espfix hack for this CPU */
1064 init_espfix_ap(cpu);
1065
1066 /* So we see what's up */
1067 announce_cpu(cpu, apicid);
1068
1069 /*
1070 * This grunge runs the startup process for
1071 * the targeted processor.
1072 */
1073 if (x86_platform.legacy.warm_reset) {
1074
1075 pr_debug("Setting warm reset code and vector.\n");
1076
1077 smpboot_setup_warm_reset_vector(start_ip);
1078 /*
1079 * Be paranoid about clearing APIC errors.
1080 */
1081 if (APIC_INTEGRATED(boot_cpu_apic_version)) {
1082 apic_write(APIC_ESR, 0);
1083 apic_read(APIC_ESR);
1084 }
1085 }
1086
1087 smp_mb();
1088
1089 /*
1090 * Wake up a CPU in difference cases:
1091 * - Intel TXT DRTM launch uses its own method to wake the APs
1092 * - Use a method from the APIC driver if one defined, with wakeup
1093 * straight to 64-bit mode preferred over wakeup to RM.
1094 * Otherwise,
1095 * - Use an INIT boot APIC message
1096 */
> 1097 if (slaunch_is_txt_launch())
1098 slaunch_wakeup_cpu_from_txt(cpu, apicid);
1099 else if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64)
1100 ret = apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu_64(apicid, start_ip);
1101 else if (apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu)
1102 ret = apic->wakeup_secondary_cpu(apicid, start_ip);
1103 else
1104 ret = wakeup_secondary_cpu_via_init(apicid, start_ip);
1105
1106 /* If the wakeup mechanism failed, cleanup the warm reset vector */
1107 if (ret)
1108 arch_cpuhp_cleanup_kick_cpu(cpu);
1109 return ret;
1110 }
1111
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread