From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.55.52.151]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E2F1317C9; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 02:11:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="ZY+f6HeC" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1700100679; x=1731636679; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=hhlyXxGrC/E9zAEp+Y8MQVMk7XkRKYj0CGW6kL41jyg=; b=ZY+f6HeCtk8a9/Wgw7ADIwrzUrgqKvrh+Y3fUqaWhlpBaruTtyk/IT97 6ZGbT2GWlTjl+S4yLmc5INj3y6wVEPVMbivdsOF3MyekFllYGqR22Tb4S M/3Vb17N5L3atItKE4ZaXCjw02amnXDGjmM0cT6veWzViscXGV5uEYbD6 7p+ebUUE0FOZjo9UaSHXrJlgJdZ0A2MyRGS6SXGIOBP2R1+wpZrDhG+/T lgY3UXGvDJjGS/xsKZUuC5btTdOGfSwdH0vJDYWPh2kglGRpRjGkFQjJG 73ruuxkUqm7whF3/aoXgr1pGn0luRDSG/vp0Z8XGbhvyOv3GJ651dE/TN Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10895"; a="371181330" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,306,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="371181330" Received: from fmsmga005.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.32]) by fmsmga107.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Nov 2023 18:11:17 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10895"; a="1096629973" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.03,306,1694761200"; d="scan'208";a="1096629973" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b8de5498638e) ([10.239.97.151]) by fmsmga005.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Nov 2023 18:11:11 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b8de5498638e with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1r3RqH-00017W-3B; Thu, 16 Nov 2023 02:10:57 +0000 Date: Thu, 16 Nov 2023 10:09:48 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Aurelien Aptel , linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, sagi@grimberg.me, hch@lst.de, kbusch@kernel.org, axboe@fb.com, chaitanyak@nvidia.com, davem@davemloft.net, kuba@kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Boris Pismenny , aaptel@nvidia.com, aurelien.aptel@gmail.com, smalin@nvidia.com, malin1024@gmail.com, ogerlitz@nvidia.com, yorayz@nvidia.com, galshalom@nvidia.com, mgurtovoy@nvidia.com, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com, dsahern@kernel.org, ast@kernel.org, jacob.e.keller@intel.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v19 01/20] net: Introduce direct data placement tcp offload Message-ID: <202311161023.IHztbwM3-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231114124255.765473-2-aaptel@nvidia.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231114124255.765473-2-aaptel@nvidia.com> Hi Aurelien, kernel test robot noticed the following build warnings: [auto build test WARNING on net/main] [also build test WARNING on net-next/main linus/master v6.7-rc1 next-20231115] [cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Aurelien-Aptel/net-Introduce-direct-data-placement-tcp-offload/20231114-205106 base: net/main patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231114124255.765473-2-aaptel%40nvidia.com patch subject: [PATCH v19 01/20] net: Introduce direct data placement tcp offload config: x86_64-rhel-8.3-rust (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231116/202311161023.IHztbwM3-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231116/202311161023.IHztbwM3-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311161023.IHztbwM3-lkp@intel.com/ All warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from net/core/skbuff.c:79: >> include/net/ulp_ddp.h:317:6: warning: no previous prototype for function 'ulp_ddp_is_cap_active' [-Wmissing-prototypes] bool ulp_ddp_is_cap_active(struct net_device *netdev, int cap_bit_nr) ^ include/net/ulp_ddp.h:317:1: note: declare 'static' if the function is not intended to be used outside of this translation unit bool ulp_ddp_is_cap_active(struct net_device *netdev, int cap_bit_nr) ^ static 1 warning generated. vim +/ulp_ddp_is_cap_active +317 include/net/ulp_ddp.h 316 > 317 bool ulp_ddp_is_cap_active(struct net_device *netdev, int cap_bit_nr) 318 { 319 return false; 320 } 321 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki