* Re: [PATCH 2/2] ipoib: Add tx timeout work to recover queue stop situation
[not found] <20231120203501.321587-3-jinpu.wang@ionos.com>
@ 2023-11-21 8:21 ` kernel test robot
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: kernel test robot @ 2023-11-21 8:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jack Wang, linux-rdma; +Cc: llvm, oe-kbuild-all, leon, jgg
Hi Jack,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on rdma/for-next]
[also build test ERROR on linus/master v6.7-rc2 next-20231121]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jack-Wang/ipoib-Fix-error-code-return-in-ipoib_mcast_join/20231121-044240
base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/rdma/rdma.git for-next
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231120203501.321587-3-jinpu.wang%40ionos.com
patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] ipoib: Add tx timeout work to recover queue stop situation
config: i386-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231121/202311211607.9eJYoznW-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 16.0.4 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git ae42196bc493ffe877a7e3dff8be32035dea4d07)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231121/202311211607.9eJYoznW-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202311211607.9eJYoznW-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c:542:9: error: call to undeclared function 'napi_reschedule'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
ret = napi_reschedule(&priv->send_napi);
^
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c:542:9: note: did you mean 'napi_schedule'?
include/linux/netdevice.h:520:20: note: 'napi_schedule' declared here
static inline bool napi_schedule(struct napi_struct *n)
^
drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c:554:8: error: call to undeclared function 'napi_reschedule'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
ret = napi_reschedule(&priv->send_napi);
^
2 errors generated.
vim +/napi_reschedule +542 drivers/infiniband/ulp/ipoib/ipoib_ib.c
533
534 /* The function will force napi_schedule */
535 void ipoib_napi_schedule_work(struct work_struct *work)
536 {
537 struct ipoib_dev_priv *priv =
538 container_of(work, struct ipoib_dev_priv, reschedule_napi_work);
539 bool ret;
540
541 do {
> 542 ret = napi_reschedule(&priv->send_napi);
543 if (!ret)
544 msleep(3);
545 } while (!ret && netif_queue_stopped(priv->dev) &&
546 test_bit(IPOIB_FLAG_INITIALIZED, &priv->flags));
547 }
548
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread