From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com>
Cc: tanzirh@google.com, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andy@kernel.org>,
linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Nick DeSaulniers <nnn@google.com>,
llvm@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/string: shrink lib/string.i via IWYU
Date: Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:24:52 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20231205132452.418722bea8f6878dca88142a@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAKwvOdn+VTM+LY6ALcgaZTL57JpiKt5rBPMSPNXsgS3MCENhDQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Tue, 5 Dec 2023 13:14:16 -0800 Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@google.com> wrote:
> >
> > The preferred way to import bit-fiddling stuff is to include
> > <linux/bits.h>. Under the hood this may include asm/bitsperlong.h. Or
> > it may not, depending on Kconfig settings (particularly architecture).
> >
>
> Just triple checking my understanding; it looks like
> include/linux/bits.h unconditionally includes asm/bitsperlong.h (which
> is implemented per arch) most of which seem to include
> asm-generic/bitsperlong.h.
>
> include/linux/bits.h also defines a few macros (BIT_MASK, BIT_WORD,
> BITS_PER_BYTE, GENMASK, etc). If lib/string.c is not using any of
> those, why can't we go straight to #including asm/bitsperlong.h? That
> should resolve to the arch specific impl which may include
> asm-generic/bitsperlong.h?
It's just a general rule. If the higher-level include is present, use
that. Because of the above, plus I guess things might change in the
future.
We've been getting better about irregular asm/include files.
But bits.h is a poor example. A better case to study is spinlock.h.
If this tool recommended including asm/spinlock.h then that won't work
on any architecture which doesn't implement SMP (there is no
arch/nios2/include/asm/spinlock.h).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-12-05 21:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 35+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-12-05 20:58 [PATCH] lib/string: shrink lib/string.i via IWYU tanzirh
2023-12-05 21:04 ` Andrew Morton
2023-12-05 21:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 21:24 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2023-12-05 21:39 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 21:43 ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:57 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-11 20:47 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-11 20:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 21:53 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:05 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-07 6:25 ` Christoph Hellwig
2023-12-05 21:38 ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:51 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 21:59 ` Greg KH
2023-12-05 22:14 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 23:46 ` Greg KH
2023-12-06 0:55 ` Al Viro
2023-12-06 3:00 ` Al Viro
2023-12-06 3:09 ` Greg KH
2023-12-14 21:04 ` Al Viro
2023-12-15 21:03 ` Al Viro
2023-12-07 12:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:10 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-12-05 22:25 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 22:15 ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 22:20 ` Nick Desaulniers
2023-12-05 22:32 ` Al Viro
2023-12-07 12:52 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 21:57 ` Al Viro
2023-12-05 21:50 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-05 22:05 ` Andy Shevchenko
2023-12-06 7:10 ` kernel test robot
2023-12-07 12:55 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20231205132452.418722bea8f6878dca88142a@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=andy@kernel.org \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-hardening@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ndesaulniers@google.com \
--cc=nnn@google.com \
--cc=tanzirh@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox