From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.7]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4741E12E58; Wed, 6 Dec 2023 06:30:38 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="k3fmHIK2" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1701844238; x=1733380238; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=In9RUFFIUXErDaIineMw7IEV2lx9EUq4uLOuxVCGDAQ=; b=k3fmHIK21bpVIZAzrGHc4DzM4QcwWYoxiaO4e5ar9FEV7WPBu9K4YG3g LCjefhOwfCDY6/prAI5vu7TFcftlc2bSh52eRkiSZTS8OK9TF83aYYe7W +C7FOLkl4sSXHUasr0aCegqna//baREGlUXEroF1GOZcvHX5xYYmEZ7f4 viSl1kkkKxSaRKCNJ3rLZuYVFk+khEKZlJQtpsESCgyAkPtw8GRw2ENBW K9pRrV0IJgaAEKLRs3KZ4D35RAU78ggHUGenS1CqnyZyQ4g0eWASvGmeF VV9/usz3AxdmfaPycrodvncezS67isbaB2XbDVrb3dRjbn4/a+bY60XEJ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="15564133" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,254,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="15564133" Received: from orsmga005.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.41]) by fmvoesa101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 05 Dec 2023 22:30:38 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10915"; a="944537718" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,254,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="944537718" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga005.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 05 Dec 2023 22:30:33 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rAlQP-000AOS-0w; Wed, 06 Dec 2023 06:30:26 +0000 Date: Wed, 6 Dec 2023 14:29:38 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Yajun Deng , mingo@redhat.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org, dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, rostedt@goodmis.org, bsegall@google.com, mgorman@suse.de, bristot@redhat.com, vschneid@redhat.com Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yajun Deng Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: Return NULL when rt entity isn't a task in rt_task_of() Message-ID: <202312061449.VhDizEfx-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231201022704.3526377-3-yajun.deng@linux.dev> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231201022704.3526377-3-yajun.deng@linux.dev> Hi Yajun, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/sched/core] [also build test ERROR on next-20231206] [cannot apply to linus/master v6.7-rc4] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Yajun-Deng/sched-fair-Return-NULL-when-entity-isn-t-a-task-in-task_of/20231201-103036 base: tip/sched/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231201022704.3526377-3-yajun.deng%40linux.dev patch subject: [PATCH 2/2] sched/rt: Return NULL when rt entity isn't a task in rt_task_of() config: arm-ixp4xx_defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312061449.VhDizEfx-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 15.0.7 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 8dfdcc7b7bf66834a761bd8de445840ef68e4d1a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231206/202312061449.VhDizEfx-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312061449.VhDizEfx-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/sched/build_policy.c:45: >> kernel/sched/rt.c:947:17: error: no member named 'highest_prio' in 'struct rt_rq' return rt_rq->highest_prio.curr; ~~~~~ ^ 1 error generated. vim +947 kernel/sched/rt.c ac086bc22997a2b kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-04-19 941 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 942 static inline int rt_se_prio(struct sched_rt_entity *rt_se) 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 943 { 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 944 struct rt_rq *rt_rq = group_rt_rq(rt_se); 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 945 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 946 if (rt_rq) e864c499d9e5780 kernel/sched_rt.c Gregory Haskins 2008-12-29 @947 return rt_rq->highest_prio.curr; 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 948 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 949 return rt_task_of(rt_se)->prio; 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 950 } 6f505b16425a512 kernel/sched_rt.c Peter Zijlstra 2008-01-25 951 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki