From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [134.134.136.20]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C235D15E98; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 06:00:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="GV/ef4iP" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1702706435; x=1734242435; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=MrU988M/tBfS1hbsyrCglPzl5e6ciu61/+PgxzZchps=; b=GV/ef4iPt6y+jCkjDYGfiQH+yraV/8/9WGU2WY7K/bRSOOvUzQ5LhH8u KJKRShB5LX8owTsU37Mxa2LjRr5M6L8FK1yq4EUaavZkerHr4Bsl+R0QE Sl7D9SdWX3ShGzkY9fDVYbqimgNwY+uiRk7/wXXrDjD7nD0MHzuqv0Wmj KmX1NeFrFZrgs+9yxO57wVyJopJEJ/XfDqjWyu20M4bIVwJJtWs1rnS/0 NsjzPWkPpVeXiCh8W2G9Ah3JlyQAX0DZ/4i8YPyUc4bTfmqijtVKOIOCd fBTDFRV+gbkRHKi/hmxEVhjIt0X6ZNwAcAKW62nyZgo9wZxM+94g29Fiu w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="385779683" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,280,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="385779683" Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by orsmga101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Dec 2023 22:00:35 -0800 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,10925"; a="774993357" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.04,280,1695711600"; d="scan'208";a="774993357" Received: from lkp-server02.sh.intel.com (HELO b07ab15da5fe) ([10.239.97.151]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Dec 2023 22:00:31 -0800 Received: from kbuild by b07ab15da5fe with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rENiu-0001Di-2x; Sat, 16 Dec 2023 06:00:28 +0000 Date: Sat, 16 Dec 2023 13:59:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Maksim Davydov , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, x86@kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, davydov-max@yandex-team.ru, den-plotnikov@yandex-team.ru, tony.luck@intel.com, tglx@linutronix.de, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, hpa@zytor.com, peterz@infradead.org, juri.lelli@redhat.com, vincent.guittot@linaro.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: add split lock counter Message-ID: <202312161352.pQ3Mhz4Z-lkp@intel.com> References: <20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max@yandex-team.ru> Hi Maksim, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on tip/x86/core] [also build test ERROR on tip/master tip/sched/core linus/master tip/auto-latest v6.7-rc5 next-20231215] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Maksim-Davydov/x86-split_lock-add-split-lock-counter/20231215-220639 base: tip/x86/core patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231215140113.57173-1-davydov-max%40yandex-team.ru patch subject: [PATCH] x86/split_lock: add split lock counter config: um-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161352.pQ3Mhz4Z-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.0 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project.git 4a5ac14ee968ff0ad5d2cc1ffa0299048db4c88a) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20231216/202312161352.pQ3Mhz4Z-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202312161352.pQ3Mhz4Z-lkp@intel.com/ All error/warnings (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:547:31: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 547 | val = __raw_readb(PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:560:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 560 | val = __le16_to_cpu((__le16 __force)__raw_readw(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:37:51: note: expanded from macro '__le16_to_cpu' 37 | #define __le16_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u16)(__le16)(x)) | ^ In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:573:61: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 573 | val = __le32_to_cpu((__le32 __force)__raw_readl(PCI_IOBASE + addr)); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/uapi/linux/byteorder/little_endian.h:35:51: note: expanded from macro '__le32_to_cpu' 35 | #define __le32_to_cpu(x) ((__force __u32)(__le32)(x)) | ^ In file included from fs/proc/base.c:68: In file included from include/linux/swap.h:9: In file included from include/linux/memcontrol.h:13: In file included from include/linux/cgroup.h:26: In file included from include/linux/kernel_stat.h:9: In file included from include/linux/interrupt.h:11: In file included from include/linux/hardirq.h:11: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/hardirq.h:5: In file included from include/asm-generic/hardirq.h:17: In file included from include/linux/irq.h:20: In file included from include/linux/io.h:13: In file included from arch/um/include/asm/io.h:24: include/asm-generic/io.h:584:33: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 584 | __raw_writeb(value, PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:594:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 594 | __raw_writew((u16 __force)cpu_to_le16(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:604:59: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 604 | __raw_writel((u32 __force)cpu_to_le32(value), PCI_IOBASE + addr); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:692:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 692 | readsb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:700:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 700 | readsw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:708:20: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 708 | readsl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:717:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 717 | writesb(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:726:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 726 | writesw(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ include/asm-generic/io.h:735:21: warning: performing pointer arithmetic on a null pointer has undefined behavior [-Wnull-pointer-arithmetic] 735 | writesl(PCI_IOBASE + addr, buffer, count); | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ In file included from fs/proc/base.c:101: >> arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:36:31: warning: declaration of 'struct cpuinfo_x86' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 36 | int mwait_usable(const struct cpuinfo_x86 *); | ^ arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:42:37: warning: declaration of 'struct cpuinfo_x86' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 42 | extern void __init sld_setup(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); | ^ arch/x86/include/asm/cpu.h:85:32: warning: declaration of 'struct cpuinfo_x86' will not be visible outside of this function [-Wvisibility] 85 | void init_ia32_feat_ctl(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c); | ^ 15 warnings generated. -- /usr/bin/ld: init/main.o: warning: relocation in read-only section `.ref.text' /usr/bin/ld: warning: .tmp_vmlinux.kallsyms1 has a LOAD segment with RWX permissions >> /usr/bin/ld: fs/proc/base.o:(.rodata+0x860): undefined reference to `proc_pid_split_locks_show' >> /usr/bin/ld: fs/proc/base.o:(.rodata+0xe08): undefined reference to `proc_tgid_split_locks_show' /usr/bin/ld: warning: creating DT_TEXTREL in a PIE clang: error: linker command failed with exit code 1 (use -v to see invocation) -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki