From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [198.175.65.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2860A39FC1; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:01:24 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710097287; cv=none; b=COEvoESy2+54HTUFE4fZclFLl/uhGjYedKUaHSYR+9uLFqJU1JYu/0R4scMyycMnkL5o2wmkVbCWgRFuzbvLNc1nMnm69j7/G5/ZwTUNPcgF5wAlYKKL5M+fCfmwrDAZ+E6TJyZyDZstJ3B1se/JAn3EJvYJSC7+RxLGzKfEHBk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710097287; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kzTJsHsowIOW1hllXszHyPTgv7ysQNkijGMj49dT1+k=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition; b=Nk+TEd7g1Fvs6YCYJv3MdBzDHpeLI7ZBFhxZuwUjhu9x37wdxTByeHE5wj+1JzyxIaMkNxK5PaVFvjFnQaf4TOjK+N5L/m1fepH4T5c1gN21pOFxwdpiBA4/AWB90rjFcDYbXl7Hr3ZzX5Ndwv4ayCP2QAzQuKlJ75NmQJggaMg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=KBE3w/rN; arc=none smtp.client-ip=198.175.65.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="KBE3w/rN" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710097285; x=1741633285; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:mime-version; bh=kzTJsHsowIOW1hllXszHyPTgv7ysQNkijGMj49dT1+k=; b=KBE3w/rNgWrca573X3psqIKXzgPu3sdRBGIE10sFy90PVRzcKE9wqEF8 6PkPto63NbHDNQ2I59T1v0o1Jwp+ZOJlnet8o7ZRrpNT6CYb96kpTgXdZ AFOJqymsrKakq+UHr20MEV09o2/2aTOicHnTZ3oi33Up8MI8n50Cn74uD +2Hn09qSWKgV5ntcAPTmdcrBi885+i7PDamixLChLYsvr+XPaULlI0/TL Njb+YvLX+mtDDO/ao0qxvI6xaACw2efJm7hg/MsedEgF+7vXBpGaHz8M6 MAuIBjgSGxrHqhasfMwleOTLJYEK81m2DvVuAAsWPz6UfzE+2v/Ng/wga Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11009"; a="27226822" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,115,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="27226822" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by orvoesa101.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 10 Mar 2024 12:01:25 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,115,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="34102865" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 10 Mar 2024 12:01:23 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rjOQC-0008UF-2B; Sun, 10 Mar 2024 19:01:20 +0000 Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 03:00:31 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Jiri Olsa Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: [jolsa-perf:bpf/optimized_uprobe_6 1/2] :7:6: error: invalid register Message-ID: <202403110200.1FfcsDZa-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/jolsa/perf.git bpf/optimized_uprobe_6 head: 89ec186aa763b7de4f2846f57d5f7ffc38d72077 commit: c46975c90ceef8ec72cfa1826b02ebea142c1787 [1/2] uprobe: Add syscall to speed up return probe config: s390-defconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240311/202403110200.1FfcsDZa-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 19.0.0git (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 503c55e17037436dcd45ac69dea8967e67e3f5e8) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240311/202403110200.1FfcsDZa-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403110200.1FfcsDZa-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from kernel/events/uprobes.c:13: In file included from include/linux/highmem.h:10: In file included from include/linux/mm.h:2188: include/linux/vmstat.h:508:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 508 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 509 | item]; | ~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:515:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 515 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 516 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:522:36: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum node_stat_item' and 'enum lru_list') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 522 | return node_stat_name(NR_LRU_BASE + lru) + 3; // skip "nr_" | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:527:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 527 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 528 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/vmstat.h:536:43: warning: arithmetic between different enumeration types ('enum zone_stat_item' and 'enum numa_stat_item') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 536 | return vmstat_text[NR_VM_ZONE_STAT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ 537 | NR_VM_NUMA_EVENT_ITEMS + | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ In file included from kernel/events/uprobes.c:27: In file included from include/linux/shmem_fs.h:11: In file included from include/linux/fs_parser.h:11: In file included from include/linux/fs_context.h:14: In file included from include/linux/security.h:35: include/linux/bpf.h:736:48: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 736 | ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:737:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 737 | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:738:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 738 | ARG_PTR_TO_CTX_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_CTX, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:739:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 739 | ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_SOCKET, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:740:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 740 | ARG_PTR_TO_STACK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_STACK, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:741:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 741 | ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | ARG_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:745:38: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 745 | ARG_PTR_TO_UNINIT_MEM = MEM_UNINIT | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, | ~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:747:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_arg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 747 | ARG_PTR_TO_FIXED_SIZE_MEM = MEM_FIXED_SIZE | ARG_PTR_TO_MEM, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:770:48: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 770 | RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:771:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 771 | RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCKET, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:772:47: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 772 | RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:773:50: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 773 | RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:775:49: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 775 | RET_PTR_TO_DYNPTR_MEM_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_MEM, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:776:45: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 776 | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:777:43: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_return_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 777 | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID_TRUSTED = PTR_TRUSTED | RET_PTR_TO_BTF_ID, | ~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:888:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 888 | PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_MAP_VALUE, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:889:42: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 889 | PTR_TO_SOCKET_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_SOCKET, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:890:46: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 890 | PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_SOCK_COMMON, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:891:44: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 891 | PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_TCP_SOCK, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ include/linux/bpf.h:892:42: warning: bitwise operation between different enumeration types ('enum bpf_type_flag' and 'enum bpf_reg_type') [-Wenum-enum-conversion] 892 | PTR_TO_BTF_ID_OR_NULL = PTR_MAYBE_NULL | PTR_TO_BTF_ID, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~ >> :7:6: error: invalid register 7 | push %rax | ^ :8:11: error: invalid register 8 | mov $462, %rax | ^ :9:1: error: invalid instruction 9 | syscall | ^ 25 warnings and 3 errors generated. -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki