From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.9]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A918A17C76; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:00:09 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710496812; cv=none; b=H10/X8ydz1FLfYXiLiJnBAoXzOCWBN+x2GCfwYTWxf5Ys53NGuz10fsoJTJK2zwr/nJkqO6b1Wkcbir25gA7Z5Ui56ROIn/O11rfsCI5oTIgZWuAxXM8J9qkUKr0Tf6ylQ48fZLQD8kJfwlcgN5ZDhCj4NRQMTOTi6Sy+We8I7E= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710496812; c=relaxed/simple; bh=TgsPBTRp6nSShb4vL2Mx+LcNmJuRLjnumD5YkOFdYI4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=RotQDMrDeg4pVvB8f5BU1NAzHuTHpDVrJYlRh55+eV9hFnPqOblkoCQ5X+xRo+HpMwtBqLc4meSVWoaJndO5MAJemGwnKo7fCxijGStSvJJFQY4Q8qyolIl79QgNyHejVf4vSt+dTBlgYofwXGnOoZ3lmklc8Bdt7S8GtNwBTaE= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=aHE/gDLL; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.9 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="aHE/gDLL" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710496810; x=1742032810; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=TgsPBTRp6nSShb4vL2Mx+LcNmJuRLjnumD5YkOFdYI4=; b=aHE/gDLLvk6BwdJO4fxRh5EkU8dnCvZ+ijuPFikmmA0muHdhnaxeo7CV LL1UhxSfAoH3wzzZ6G+H0LoHzQjipPw48Ju50z1xE2vTMq97NcxAnrRsQ PB2ad/bo56jBFuXetAFDNKwN9fpT+oFLPUHSTW3ingSV4SvAvPpuYp0/9 0nJxhq71g1Rlb98edfVgxu2qGawXuhDXenlSdetQTkhgj0U8F0TaiulXE dDafyfQiABOjbLIZmZIuCt7S3FTbdOYm6YWD6+UYyvLeXfOlZZfHJi6LT f0hgxlIg2HJy9BwsWkFYHqAfoWFV7L4JhD2eqz50FNn4FKVKy1+O8vpZ+ Q==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11013"; a="16081056" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="16081056" Received: from fmviesa002.fm.intel.com ([10.60.135.142]) by fmvoesa103.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 15 Mar 2024 03:00:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,128,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="35749372" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by fmviesa002.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 15 Mar 2024 03:00:04 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rl4M6-000EJx-0R; Fri, 15 Mar 2024 10:00:02 +0000 Date: Fri, 15 Mar 2024 17:59:53 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Vignesh Balasubramanian , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-toolchains@vger.kernel.org Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, mpe@ellerman.id.au, npiggin@gmail.com, christophe.leroy@csgroup.eu, aneesh.kumar@kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.ibm.com, ebiederm@xmission.com, keescook@chromium.org, x86@kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-mm@kvack.org, bpetkov@amd.com, jinisusan.george@amd.com, matz@suse.de, binutils@sourceware.org, jhb@freebsd.org, felix.willgerodt@intel.com, Vignesh Balasubramanian Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files Message-ID: <202403151742.VEz04MqR-lkp@intel.com> References: <20240314112359.50713-2-vigbalas@amd.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20240314112359.50713-2-vigbalas@amd.com> Hi Vignesh, kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on linus/master] [also build test ERROR on v6.8 next-20240315] [cannot apply to kees/for-next/execve tip/x86/core powerpc/next powerpc/fixes] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Vignesh-Balasubramanian/x86-elf-Add-a-new-note-section-containing-Xfeatures-information-to-x86-core-files/20240314-192650 base: linus/master patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20240314112359.50713-2-vigbalas%40amd.com patch subject: [PATCH 1/1] x86/elf: Add a new .note section containing Xfeatures information to x86 core files config: i386-buildonly-randconfig-001-20240315 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151742.VEz04MqR-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240315/202403151742.VEz04MqR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403151742.VEz04MqR-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): >> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1858:8: error: call to undeclared function 'dump_emit'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1858 | if (!dump_emit(cprm, &xc, sizeof(struct xfeat_component))) | ^ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1869:8: error: call to undeclared function 'dump_emit'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1869 | if (!dump_emit(cprm, &xc, sizeof(struct xfeat_component))) | ^ arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1899:7: error: call to undeclared function 'dump_emit'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1899 | if (!dump_emit(cprm, &en, sizeof(en))) | ^ >> arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c:1903:7: error: call to undeclared function 'dump_align'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration] 1903 | if (!dump_align(cprm, 4)) | ^ 4 errors generated. vim +/dump_emit +1858 arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c 1846 1847 struct xfeat_component xc; 1848 int num_records = 0; 1849 int i; 1850 1851 /* XFEATURE_FPU and XFEATURE_SSE, both are fixed legacy states. */ 1852 for (i = 0; i < FIRST_EXTENDED_XFEATURE; i++) { 1853 xc.xfeat_type = i; 1854 xc.xfeat_sz = xstate_sizes[i]; 1855 xc.xfeat_off = xstate_offsets[i]; 1856 xc.xfeat_flags = xstate_flags[i]; 1857 > 1858 if (!dump_emit(cprm, &xc, sizeof(struct xfeat_component))) 1859 return 0; 1860 num_records++; 1861 } 1862 1863 for_each_extended_xfeature(i, fpu_user_cfg.max_features) { 1864 xc.xfeat_type = i; 1865 xc.xfeat_sz = xstate_sizes[i]; 1866 xc.xfeat_off = xstate_offsets[i]; 1867 xc.xfeat_flags = xstate_flags[i]; 1868 1869 if (!dump_emit(cprm, &xc, sizeof(struct xfeat_component))) 1870 return 0; 1871 num_records++; 1872 } 1873 1874 return num_records; 1875 } 1876 1877 static int get_xsave_desc_size(void) 1878 { 1879 /* XFEATURE_FP and XFEATURE_SSE, both are fixed legacy states */ 1880 int xfeatures_count = 2; 1881 int i; 1882 1883 for_each_extended_xfeature(i, fpu_user_cfg.max_features) 1884 xfeatures_count++; 1885 1886 return xfeatures_count * (sizeof(struct xfeat_component)); 1887 } 1888 1889 int elf_coredump_extra_notes_write(struct coredump_params *cprm) 1890 { 1891 const char *owner_name = "LINUX"; 1892 int num_records = 0; 1893 struct elf_note en; 1894 1895 en.n_namesz = strlen(owner_name) + 1; 1896 en.n_descsz = get_xsave_desc_size(); 1897 en.n_type = NT_X86_XSAVE_LAYOUT; 1898 1899 if (!dump_emit(cprm, &en, sizeof(en))) 1900 return 1; 1901 if (!dump_emit(cprm, owner_name, en.n_namesz)) 1902 return 1; > 1903 if (!dump_align(cprm, 4)) 1904 return 1; 1905 1906 num_records = dump_xsave_layout_desc(cprm); 1907 if (!num_records) { 1908 pr_warn("Error adding XSTATE layout ELF note. XSTATE buffer in the core file will be unparseable."); 1909 return 1; 1910 } 1911 1912 /* Total size should be equal to the number of records */ 1913 if ((sizeof(struct xfeat_component) * num_records) != en.n_descsz) { 1914 pr_warn("Error adding XSTATE layout ELF note. The size of the .note section does not match with the total size of the records."); 1915 return 1; 1916 } 1917 1918 if (!dump_align(cprm, 4)) 1919 return 1; 1920 1921 return 0; 1922 } 1923 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki