From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mgamail.intel.com (mgamail.intel.com [192.198.163.10]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B7D1618026; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:10:18 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710670221; cv=none; b=pBLKwjhvpDo9yhVx9qpFJ8ecZGrz8neM1x/jh15belhS+UVfcJODSPX1p1mZH+VmMdhf24cOJn8wZpvL572BOh+QZwBzl+jG7Y55kTqQZn+/3wuHROq3jzRkp6Y0eoiDORpfJ0/Gc1BNlHMVnOHQ31siFxBoK35qrUou2mC3VCU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1710670221; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RH3jhxvXqqxpZMvOrjGJpJOcFyWT4dS+IUtpLkuziQY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LOH4jUtG8rV7D54jvhuSc38/ZE409F3fYG+CZN43XY/dwPkunn0UWyBvT6FIlZ78l+zg3Gxe6NAxp6MuXAs1eMFOs3DZ8Ta4sX8uRaOje/IVFdIjb+IWnlDulUkRnEwuV1ZfcfJ9C7O7Hs+tjDmlVKMX/1ZViKNxxLjXrTLZ9Lc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b=el9X9aBW; arc=none smtp.client-ip=192.198.163.10 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=intel.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=intel.com header.i=@intel.com header.b="el9X9aBW" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=intel.com; i=@intel.com; q=dns/txt; s=Intel; t=1710670218; x=1742206218; h=date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references: mime-version:in-reply-to; bh=RH3jhxvXqqxpZMvOrjGJpJOcFyWT4dS+IUtpLkuziQY=; b=el9X9aBWA4hEHEuMZRxdybjCbulo4bWzAzHqrLMq86NxxMg7jxRTJJAr oGQeuEMDWQqmVsRPFCDsPXPQ6hn3/Y3PhkBxV1d4xfnt5a/CetQfnFj+r ezj9I5bQXC/cFl86TjwcOi2PCAwjWtAMSGwGI0mzmgeveX3wYuxTQGB5E Tkw+27m2wZqqoIgDUedzxE8Kmz8xBGjEYDFX6yVYpvMSUPAjRpEUX/OkB 7bsWlIJ/kUaUBDW6krSJabKm6cQ50jb8ZTBaY9MOUFE6maPZZPA8DZOIL nSszTBtN34E7+18E96FOiP6Fqm16CwjhOW6NW/bR8jQRSMY6nJxEqkiza w==; X-IronPort-AV: E=McAfee;i="6600,9927,11015"; a="16893450" X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,132,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="16893450" Received: from orviesa003.jf.intel.com ([10.64.159.143]) by fmvoesa104.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 17 Mar 2024 03:10:17 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="6.07,132,1708416000"; d="scan'208";a="17876616" Received: from lkp-server01.sh.intel.com (HELO b21307750695) ([10.239.97.150]) by orviesa003.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 17 Mar 2024 03:10:16 -0700 Received: from kbuild by b21307750695 with local (Exim 4.96) (envelope-from ) id 1rlnT3-000GAb-2z; Sun, 17 Mar 2024 10:10:13 +0000 Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2024 18:09:29 +0800 From: kernel test robot To: Fan Wu Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v15 17/21] fsverity: consume builtin signature via LSM hook Message-ID: <202403171729.j4sXFWcI-lkp@intel.com> References: <1710560151-28904-18-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: llvm@lists.linux.dev List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1710560151-28904-18-git-send-email-wufan@linux.microsoft.com> Hi Fan, [This is a private test report for your RFC patch.] kernel test robot noticed the following build errors: [auto build test ERROR on axboe-block/for-next] [also build test ERROR on linus/master next-20240315] [cannot apply to device-mapper-dm/for-next lwn/docs-next v6.8] [If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note. And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information] url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Fan-Wu/security-add-ipe-lsm/20240316-114235 base: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/axboe/linux-block.git for-next patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/1710560151-28904-18-git-send-email-wufan%40linux.microsoft.com patch subject: [RFC PATCH v15 17/21] fsverity: consume builtin signature via LSM hook config: x86_64-buildonly-randconfig-006-20240317 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240317/202403171729.j4sXFWcI-lkp@intel.com/config) compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18) reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20240317/202403171729.j4sXFWcI-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags | Reported-by: kernel test robot | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202403171729.j4sXFWcI-lkp@intel.com/ All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): In file included from fs/verity/open.c:11: include/linux/security.h:1029:33: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int] 1029 | enum lsm_intgr_type, type, | ^ | int include/linux/security.h:1029:31: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C2x extension [-Wc2x-extensions] 1029 | enum lsm_intgr_type, type, | ^ include/linux/security.h:1519:32: error: type specifier missing, defaults to 'int'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit int [-Wimplicit-int] 1519 | enum lsm_intgr_type, type, | ^ | int include/linux/security.h:1519:30: warning: omitting the parameter name in a function definition is a C2x extension [-Wc2x-extensions] 1519 | enum lsm_intgr_type, type, | ^ >> fs/verity/open.c:182:36: error: too few arguments to function call, expected 5, have 4 180 | return security_inode_setintegrity(inode, LSM_INTGR_FSV_SIG, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 181 | desc->signature, 182 | le32_to_cpu(desc->sig_size)); | ^ include/linux/security.h:1028:19: note: 'security_inode_setintegrity' declared here 1028 | static inline int security_inode_setintegrity(struct inode *inode, | ^ ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1029 | enum lsm_intgr_type, type, | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 1030 | const void *value, size_t size) | ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ 2 warnings and 3 errors generated. vim +182 fs/verity/open.c 175 176 #ifdef CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES 177 static int fsverity_inode_setintegrity(struct inode *inode, 178 const struct fsverity_descriptor *desc) 179 { 180 return security_inode_setintegrity(inode, LSM_INTGR_FSV_SIG, 181 desc->signature, > 182 le32_to_cpu(desc->sig_size)); 183 } 184 #else 185 static inline int fsverity_inode_setintegrity(struct inode *inode, 186 const struct fsverity_descriptor *desc) 187 { 188 return 0; 189 } 190 #endif /* CONFIG_FS_VERITY_BUILTIN_SIGNATURES */ 191 -- 0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki